We are not only living with a viral epidemic, we are living in an epidemic of misinformation. Sadly, a huge amount of misinformation is coming from the mass media most Americans count on to get their news. Every day on every channel, you hear claims being repeated over and over again that are not supported by any evidence. Like everything else with the Corona Virus, the American people have not been told the truth about the shots they are now being given. As a person with a Degree in Science Education, I think people deserve to know the scientific facts about the drugs they are being given. Therefore, in this article, I will review ten problems I hope you will think about before deciding to run the risk of getting one of the new GMO shots.
#1 The GMO Shot Naming Problem
Drug companies are falsely claiming that the shots they are giving people are “vaccines.” This is a blatant misuse of the English language. The word vaccine comes from cows. The last time I checked, cows were natural animals. All past vaccines were supposedly from naturally occurring things – things that humans have adapted to over millions of years. We need to be clear that the new GMO shots contain stuff that no human has ever been exposed to before. Because these new shots have been Genetically Modified, we should call them GMO shots.
Here is an analogy that might help. Some people have compared taking the GMO shot to eating GMO corn. GMO foods can cause so many problems for your body that they have been banned in many countries. This is also why some people look for Organic foods and try to stay away from GMO food. But while I am using the term GMO to describe the shots, it is inaccurate to compare the potential harm from eating genetically modified corn to the harm from being injected with a genetically modified shot. While both corn and the shot are genetically modified, GMO corn involves modification of corn genes. Eating GMO corn is not likely to change your own DNA.
By sharp contrast, the whole point of the new GMO shots is to genetically modify genes in your human immune system. The organism that is being genetically modified is the person getting the shot. No previous vaccine has ever been designed to genetically modify people. Nor were traditional vaccines made in some sealed laboratory by technicians wearing Hazmat suits.
So please stop calling these shots vaccines. Using this term for these new shots is extremely misleading. A more accurate term would be Recombinant DNA shots. But that is too hard for most people to remember or understand. I have therefore decided to call these new shots GMO shots. This will give people some warning that of the risks involved.
Baseball legend Hank Aaron, was subjected to the Moderna GMO shot on January 5, 2021. Hank died less than two weeks, on January 21, 2021, despite being in excellent health. Hank was the victim of a billion-dollar pro-GMO shot propaganda campaign.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman and chief legal counsel for Children’s Health Defense, said: “Aaron’s tragic death is part of a wave of suspicious deaths among elderly closely following administration of COVID vaccines. Studies show that self-interested pharmaceutical company researchers, physicians, nursing homes and health officials seldom report vaccine injuries. Instead, they dismiss injuries and deaths as ‘unrelated’ to vaccination. Public health advocates worry that the vast majority of injuries and deaths will go unreported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), the notoriously broken voluntary surveillance system run by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).”
A 2001 HHS study concluded that “fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries” are reported to VAERS.
#2 The Danger of Opening Pandora’s Box
Some have compared Recombinant DNA Technology to the legend of Pandora’s Box. For the record, I have publicly opposed Recombinant DNA technology for more than 40 years. When I got my degree in Science Education, both my Organic Chemistry professor and my Genetics professor gave use students long lectures about the dangers of recombinant DNA technology. Organic chemistry is the study of carbon based reactions. What you learn is that the chemistry of living organisms is extremely complex. There are more possible organic chemical reactions than there are stars in the Universe. Genetics is even more complex than Organic Chemistry.
Meanwhile, recombinant DNA is about creating fake life forms for fun and profit. A lunatic can create something that is half dog and half lizard and patent his “dizard.” It is insane. It is like letting parents patent their children in order to make money off them. If you think I am exaggerating, it is time to wake up. Drug companies have patented their GMO shots and are making billions of dollars off them.
As we review further below, GMO shots are certain to harm your immune system. They may also harm your neural system, your circulation system, your digestive system and your reproductive system. They may increase cancer, heart disease and autoimmune diseases. But the truth is that we do not really know how much harm there will be in the long term in giving millions of people GMO shots. This is why folks compare this Frankenstein Experiment to opening Pandora’s Box.
The Greek legend of Pandora’s box, a story which first appeared about 2700 years ago, was an attempt to explain why there is evil in the world. Apparently, the head Greek God, called Zeus, gave instructions to create the first woman. Her name was Pandora which is a combination of two Greek words Pan – meaning All - and Dora - meaning Gifts. Pandora was thus All Giving. Unfortunately, Pandora also had some shortcomings. These included the power of speech, putting in her "lies and crafty words." Pandora also suffered from “a shameless mind and a deceitful nature.”
Pandora also came with a jar (later changed to a box) which she opened. Out of this jar (or box) came “countless plagues” which filled the earth with evil.
Thus, the legend of Pandora is similar to the legend of Eve in the Hebrew Bible – with the difference being that Eve ate an apple and Pandora opened a box. The end result was the same as we have been dealing with the problem of evil ever since.
Recombinant DNA (rDNA) technology is the new Pandora’s Box. You have no idea what will happen until you open the box. But there is a huge incentive to open the box because you can make billions of dollars giving people shots they think they need to stay alive. And because the technology will alter human genes, it may cause problems for humans for generations to come.
#3 The PCR Test Credibility Problem
The PCR test from the beginning in January 2020 has been used not only as a basis for the claim that there has been explosion of Corona Virus cases – but also for the claim that there has been an explosion of corona virus fatalities. If the PCR test is not accurate, then the claim that there was an explosion of corona virus cases and corona virus fatalities is also not accurate.
We, the unsuspecting and naive public, were lead to believe that a positive PCR test meant that the person who got the test must be infected with the corona virus and must be capable of transmitting this deadly virus to others. But the truth is that at least some members of the CDC have known all along that the PCR Test is not accurate. This means that they also knew that the Corona case numbers were false and that the Corona fatality numbers were false.
The PCR Test Credibility problem is an issue that should trouble anyone who cares about the truth. This is because, as you will shortly see, it has been known for more than 20 years that the PCR test as it is currently administered is certain to result in over 90% false positives when the cycle threshold count is greater than 35.
If one really wanted to be accurate, one should not include any Cycle Threshold Count greater than 25. Yet in January 2020, the CDC approved PCR tests with a cycle threshold count of 35 to 45.
The research on the lack of accuracy of the PCR test goes back as far as 1992. Here is a quote from Stephen Bustin, who is considered one of the foremost experts on PCR in the world. The quote is from his 2017 article, "Talking the talk, but not walking the walk: RT-qPCR as a paradigm for the lack of reproducibility in molecular research":
"Awareness of variability problems associated with PCR has been long-standing, with the first report describing inconsistencies with replicate and serial specimens evaluated within and between laboratories as early as 1992."
Here is an article on the problems of PCR testing from 2000: Calogero et al, 2000 Limitations of the nested reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction British Journal of Cancer 83 184-187 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363472/pdf/83-6691282a.pdf
The study used a Cycle Threshold of 30 cycles. Here was the conclusion of the study: “In conclusion, the nested RT-PCR on tyrosinase to detect the presence of malignant melanoma micrometastases in lymph nodes has limited diagnostic value, due to the high percentage of false-positive results in lymph nodes of non-melanoma patients.”
Put in plain English, even a cycle threshold as low as 30 has too many false positives to be of any use.
What is the problem with 30 cycles?
Each cycle doubles the amount of the target gene. Therefore a cycle count of 10 increases the concentration of the target gene (and therefore the likelihood of a false positive) by a factor of 1000 over the original concentration. A cycle count of 20 increases the concentration by a factor of one million. A cycle count of 30 increases the concentration by a factor of one billion. Any Ct greater than 30 is virtually useless due to the very high percentage of false positives. We have known this since the 1990s.
Here for example is a graph from a Cycle Threshold study in 2004:
https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/33/20/e179/1082564
The graph confirms that as the number of PCR Cycle Threshold (Ct) increases, the accuracy of the target genes decrease. Note that each cycle doubles the amount of the target gene. The above graph only goes to a Cycle Threshold of 20. But you can see that if you extended the Cycle Threshold to 30, the accuracy falls to near zero.
Here is a graph on Cycle Count study from 2008:
https://www.nature.com/articles/nprot.2008.73
Research of the false positives of corona virus PCR tests was first published on May 22, 2020. In an article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases on May 22, 2020, Bullard et al reported that patients could not be contagious with Ct greater than 25 as the virus is not detected in culture above this value
Bullard J, Dust K, Funk D, et al. Predicting infectious severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 from diagnostic samples.
Clin Infect Dis May 22, 2020. Here is the link to this study:
https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa638/5842165
Since May 2020, there have been more than 100 studies published on this topic. Here is one from September 28, 2020
Jafaar et al., Correlation Between 3790 Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction–Positives Samples and Positive Cell Cultures, Including 1941 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Isolates. Published September 28, 2020. Here is the link to this study:
https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1491/5912603
“At Ct = 35, the value we used to report a positive result for PCR, less than 3% of cultures are positive.”
In other words, some studies concluded that there was no successful virus isolation of SARS-CoV-2 at any Ct values above 24 while other studies found “less than 3%” were still viable at Ct 35. However, even then, only non-infectious (dead) viruses are detected with Ct values of 35.
Many of these studies were summarized in a report on November 27, 2020. Here is a link to this report: https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/
Here are two quotes from this report:
“At Ct = 25, up to 70% of patients remain positive in culture and that at Ct = 30 this value drops to 20%. At Ct = 35, the value we used to report a positive result for PCR is less than 3%.”
“If someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the case in most laboratories in Europe & the US), the probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%, the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”
Here is a table I created based on this report comparing the percent of false positives to the ct threshold:
|
PCR Test Cycle Threshold |
Percent of False Positives |
|
0 |
0 |
|
5 |
.05 |
|
10 |
.1 |
|
15 |
.15 |
|
20 |
.2 |
|
25 |
.3 |
|
30 |
.8 |
|
35 |
.97 |
|
40 |
.99 |
Here is a graph of the data in this table.
A study published on September 1, 2020 found that even the majority of 161 people hospitalized as patients believed to have the corona virus and testing positive for the corona virus turned out to not have live corona virus when their samples were ran through a culture test:
https://www.cebm.net/study/covid-19-testing-and-correlation-with-infectious-virus-cycle-thresholds-and-analytical-sensitivity/
Of those confirmed by culture to be positive for live corona viruses, all except 1 were PCR positive at or before a Cycle Threshold of 25. Of those found to be culture negative, there were false PCR positives even with Cycle Thresholds as low as 15. Above Ct of 25, 95% of the PCR positives were false positives.
Kary Mullis, inventor and co-winner of Nobel Prize in 1993 for his PCR procedure, stated many times that his procedure, PCR, Polymerase Chain Reaction, was invented to MANUFACTURE large amounts of DNA from a small sample, but was NOT to be used to amplify a small DNA sample or fragment to establish presence of a virus and used as a test. "The test was not well-suited to and never designed to diagnose disease. PCR testing cannot detect how much of a virus exists in a person. Exposure of the existence of incomplete traces of a virus do not mean a person is infected with a disease."
So if it was known that a Ct of over 25 is not reliable, why did the CDC instruct vendors to use a Cycle threshold of 35 to 40???
There can only be one answer to this question. The CDC wanted to drive up the number of false positives. Put in plain English, the CDC from the very start has been and continues to be lying to the American people.
The reality is that over 95% of all so-called “positive” corona cases are not contagious. These PCR positive people can not transmit the corona virus to another person. These PCR positive people can not and will not die from the corona virus – because they do not have any measurable amount of the live corona virus in their body. The problem with PCR test false positives is now so well known and scientifically accepted that it has even been reported in the New York Times. (LINK to the NY Times article is not included because the article is behind a pay wall and I refuse to promote the NY Times. If you want to read the article, just do a Google search).
The only question left is what number we should use to convert the fake case numbers and fake fatality numbers to more accurate case numbers and fatality numbers. If the percent of false positive PCR tests is over 95%, then we should divide reported cases and reported fatalities by 20. However, if the percent of false positive PCR tests is 90%, then we should divide reported cases and reported fatalities by 10.
As of February 6, 2021, in the US, there have been about 323 million PCR tests given – almost one per person. But because people are often forced to take the test up to 10 times trying to get a negative test, the actual number of people tested as about 10% of our population. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Worldometer and the CDC claim that about 10% of the US population has tested positive for the corona virus. In fact, it is likely to be more like 1 percent. The CDC also claims that 474,669 people in the US have died from the corona virus. If we divide by 10, then this real number is about 48,000 – similar to the seasonal flu. If we divide by 20, then the real number is about 24,000 – much less than the seasonal flu (which by the way appears to have magically disappeared this year for the first time in history).
In short, we know that the CDC has been deliberately lying to us about corona virus cases and fatalities the entire time. So why should anyone trust anything they say about the safety of the GMO shots?
#4 The Shocking Absence of GMO Shot Test Data
Normally, with any real vaccine, there would be years of clinical trials to verify the long term safety of the vaccine. However, thanks to the fake crisis due to the fake PCR tests, there supposedly was no time to do any actual testing of the new GMO shots. All that happened was these shots were given to a few carefully chosen people (paid thousands each). These people had to be young and healthy and could not have any autoimmune diseases.
Ironically, the so-called “trial” did not test whether these people had the corona virus at the beginning or the end of the test or whether they were actively contagious. Likely the lack of PCR tests was because the drug manufacturers know that the PCR tests are worthless.
To be approved, all the GMO shots needed to provide was evidence that the young healthy people had fewer corona-like symptoms that the control group which was not given the GMO shots.
On December 8, 2020, drug peddlers published a report in the Lancet medical journal falsely claiming that the AstraZeneca GMO shot was “safe and effective.” https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32661-1/fulltext
In fact, there was no actual data reported in this report. The drug peddlers stated: “There were no peer-reviewed publications available on efficacy of any severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines…”
In reality, the claims made in the report were manipulated to show efficacy that was not evident in the underlying data. If you went to the CDC Clinical Trails website on December 22, 2020, you would have found the following for the AZ GMO shot data:
https://web.archive.org/web/20201128213442/https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT04516746
Thus, the full study will not be completed until 2022. The situation is similar for the Pfizer GMO shot. On November 18, 2020, Pfizer announced that their GMO shot was 95% effective. https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-conclude-phase-3-study-covid-19-vaccine
Keep in mind that the above press release is not a real scientific study. It is just an ad from a drug company.
How did Pfizer back up their claims?
Let’s take a closer look at this report published on November 13, 2020 in the British Medical Journal to find the answer. https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4347/rr-4
The original report was so bad that on January 14, 2021, the editors of the British Medical Journal were forced to add a clarification about the claim that the GMO shot was over 90% effective. Here is the trick math that was used:
The GMO shot group had 8 confirmed cases (whatever that means) out of 18,310 people in this group. Thus, the chances of someone in this healthy group having the corona virus was (0.044%). For those who are math challenged, 0.04 percent is much less than one percent and less than one person in one hundred.
The drug company then claimed that the non-GMO shot group had 162 corona cases out of 18,319 people in the non-GMO shot group. However, there was no evidence given to support this claim. Thus, the chances for someone in this healthy group to have the corona virus was (0.88%). For those who are math challenged, 0.88 percent is is also less than one percent.
But rather than admitting that almost no one in either group got the corona virus, the drug peddlers used the “relative risk” by claiming that the GMO shot group was over 90% better than the non-corona group. Relative risk is extremely misleading because neither healthy group was actually facing any real risk.
The absolute difference between the groups was less than one percent. Even worse, the 162 people in the non-GMO shot group that the drug peddlers claimed to be positive were never tested via the PCR test or any other test. The subjected were merely rated according to “corona symptoms.” The only real conclusion from the above numbers is that for healthy people, the risk of getting the corona virus (never mind dying from it) are less than one percent – whether you are given the shot or not.
Evidence Pfizer Hid 311 Sick People in the GMO Shot Group
Regardless of the fact that less than one percent of either group had any symptoms, it still sounds impressive that the GMO shot group only had 8 sick people while the control group had 162 sick people. 162 minus 8 means that there were 154 fewer sick people in the GMO shot group (out of more than 40,000 extremely healthy people in the study). When I first read this claim, I thought it was simply too unlikely to be true.
Sure enough, it turns out that Pfizer was lying. Here is the smoking gun. If you read the full 52 page report that Pfizer submitted to the FDA on December 10, 2020, you will find at the bottom of page 18 a small note explaining that 311 people in the GMO shot group were excluded 7 days AFTER the end of the trial for “protocol deviations” while only 60 people were excluded from the control group. 311 minus 60 means that 251 more people were excluded AFTER the study from the GMO shot group than from the control group.
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download
Assuming that the “protocol deviation” was a convenient way of hiding sick people in the GMO shot group, this means that there were actually 311 plus 6 equals 317 sick people in the GMO shot group versus 162 plus 60 equals 222 sick people in the control group. Put in plain English, there were 95 more sick people in the GMO shot group than in the control group. This is still less than one percent of either group getting sick. But more important, had Pfizer told the truth, they would have had to admit that the GMO shot had absolutely no benefit and thus could not have been approved by the FDA – a result that would have cost Pfizer billions of dollars. So instead, they hide the true data at the bottom of page 18. Here is a screen shot of this page:
Why else would 311 people be excluded from the GMO shot group 7 days after the second shot?
On December 10, 2020, the FDA published a report on the Pfizer GMO shot stating: “[There is]…currently insufficient data to make conclusions about the safety of the vaccine in sub-populations such as children less than 16 years of age, pregnant and lactating individuals, and immunocompromised individuals…..[the] risk of vaccine-enhanced disease over time, potentially associated with waning immunity, remains unknown.” https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download
#5 Nearly all of us were excluded from the initial fake testing
The reason the FDA issued the warning admitting that the actual risks of the GMO shots are unknown is because of the extremely limited criteria of those initially given the shots. Here is a partial list of the exclusion criteria for Phase 1. https://archive.is/9cQQh
Other medical or psychiatric condition including recent (within the past year) or active suicidal ideation.
Known infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), or hepatitis B virus (HBV).
History of severe adverse reaction associated with a vaccine and/or severe allergic reaction (eg, anaphylaxis).
Previous clinical corona symptoms.
Individuals at high risk for severe corona, including those with any of the following risk factors:
Hypertension
Diabetes
Chronic pulmonary disease
Asthma
Current vaping or smoking
History of chronic smoking within the prior year
Over Weight BMI >30 kg/m2
Individuals working in occupations with high risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 (healthcare worker, emergency response personnel).
Immunocompromised individuals with known or suspected immunodeficiency.
Individuals with a history of autoimmune disease.
Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
Individuals who receive treatment for cancer or an autoimmune disease.
Previous participation in other studies involving study intervention containing lipid nanoparticles.
Positive test for HIV, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibodies (HBc Abs), or hepatitis C virus antibodies (HCV Abs) at the screening visit.
Because of the above exclusion list, the 39 older people in the study were among the most healthy older people you will ever meet. Of the 39 older people in the phase one study, none of them had the serious comorbidities which the overwhelming majority of those who die “with” COVID 19 possess.
Despite this FDA warning and this massive exclusion list, the first people subjected to the GMO shot were the most vulnerable, many of whom are immunocompromised.
#6 GMO Shots can cause Long Term Damage
On November 13, 2020, a researcher named Allan Cunningham published the following rebuttal of the November 8, 2020 Pfizer report. Here are a couple of his concerns about the long term health risks of people exposed to the GMO shot :
“Will vaccinees who are later exposed to corona viruses have more severe illness as a result of antibody-dependent enhancement of infection (ADEI), a known hazard of corona virus vaccines? Is there squalene in the Pfizer vaccine? If so, will vaccinees be subject to autoimmune diseases, like Gulf War Syndrome and narcolepsy that have been associated with the adjuvant? We already know that current Covid-19 vaccine trials are unlikely to show a reduction in severe illness or deaths. (Doshi, BMJ 2020;371:m4037, October 21) Will they be like seasonal influenza vaccines, which have not proved to be lifesavers, and may even have increased overall mortality in the elderly? (Anderson et al, Ann Intern Med 2020;172:445) We need a lot more time and a lot more data, especially in view of massive uncertainties about Covid-19 case definitions and statistics.”
Why are some of us worried about potential long term health problems from GMO shots?
To understand the problem, we need to go beyond the hype and propaganda and look at what the shot actually does. One function of DNA is to create proteins. After injection into the host organism, recombinant DNA produces recombinant proteins. Therefore, those who get the GMO shot will wind up with recombinant proteins running around their bodies – which might create all kinds of long term problems.
The biggest problem is the harm that the GMO shot can do to your immune system. The GMO shot uses a sequence of genetic RNA material produced in a lab that, when injected into your body, will invade your cells and hijack your cells’ protein-making machinery called ribosomes to produce the viral components that supposedly will train your immune system to fight the virus. But because of the complexity of the human immune system, the shot can actually have the opposite effect. GMO shots are programmed to make your cells produce the corona virus spike protein. This might help. But it also might lead to or worsen your autoimmune responses.
#7 PEG… The Devil is in the Details
The unknown consequences of the GMO attack virus is bad enough. But there is also a problem with the compound or missile used to deliver this nuclear warhead. That compound is called polyethylene glycol (PEG). PEG has never been used before in any approved vaccine. But it has been used in many drugs that have triggered anaphylaxis—a potentially life-threatening reaction that can cause rashes, a plummeting blood pressure, shortness of breath, and a fast heartbeat. Some allergists and immunologists believe that a significant number of people previously exposed to PEG may have high levels of antibodies against PEG, putting them at risk of an anaphylactic reaction to the new GMO shot.
This known sensitivity to PEG is likely why both Pfizer and Moderna excluded people with a history of allergies in their Phase 1 trails. Both GMO shots contain mRNA wrapped in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) with PEG that help carry it to human cells but also act as an adjuvant, a vaccine ingredient that supposedly stimulates the human immune response.
The LNPs are “PEGylated”—chemically attached to PEG molecules that cover the outside of the particles and increase their stability and life span. As much as 72% of people have at least some antibodies against PEGs, according to a 2016 study led by Samuel Lai, a pharmacology-engineer at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, presumably as a result of exposure to cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. About 7% have a level that may be high enough to predispose them to anaphylactic reactions, he found.
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03437#
Screening millions of people for anti-PEG antibodies before they are vaccinated is not feasible. Instead, CDC guidelines recommend not giving the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines to anyone with a history of severe allergic reaction to any component of the vaccine.
Will the GMO shots make women infertile?
Some have claimed that the GMO shots can make women infertile. You can read about the risk of infertility on page 5 (# XI) of this Stay of Action filed with the European Medicines Agency by Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg and Dr. Michael Readon, the former head of Pfizer research. They are trying to halt some of the Covid-19 vaccines due to this concern. “There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile.”
https://healthimpactnews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdf
In terms of a known Pfizer GMO shot side effect, 4 test subjects got Bells palsy, a form of facial paralysis. The December 9th article goes on to explain the % of people who had side effects, what the side effects were and their severity. “Four trial participants who received the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine experienced facial paralysis, according to the Food and Drug Administration. The FDA said the issue should be monitored as the jab becomes more widely available.
The potentially concerning cases were revealed after the US drug regulator published an analysis of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine ahead of a meeting to consider emergency use authorization for the jab in the United States.
According to the documents, Bell’s palsy was reported by four participants during phase 3 trials. The individuals had been administered the jab, and no members of the placebo group experienced similar adverse effects.
The condition resembles a stroke, with most sufferers watching helplessly as one side of their face droops and their muscles go limp. In some rare situations, both sides of the face may become paralyzed. It is unclear what causes Bell’s palsy, although the temporary paralysis usually goes away on its own.”
https://www.rt.com/usa/509081-pfizer-vaccine-fda-bells-palsy-covid/
According to the FDA, here are the most active ingredients in the Pfizer GMO shot (followed by links explaining what each is):
mRNA: This is the nuclear payload being delivered by the FAT missile to human cells. Messenger RNA is used to create proteins. There are millions and perhaps billions of different types of mRNA and related proteins. The FDA does not explain what the makeup of the Pfizer mRNA is. But there is no doubt that it is some kind of Recombinant or GMO RNA created by Pfizer which modifies the corona virus spike protein. In other words, it is a GMO version of a portion of the corona virus.
All the rest of these fat-based chemicals are a missile designed to transport the mRNA past the human skin barrier and human cell barrier. Then are the box that holds the GMO RNA. These are the main components of the fat missile. None of these components occur in nature. Thus, all of them are GMO. Also, the structure of these huge molecules is very fragile which is why they have to be stored at extremely low temperatures. At room temperature, they will quickly fall apart. Without them the mRNA will not be able to get across the skin and inside human cells:
Polyethylene glycol (aka PEG)
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/substance/347911138#section=Deposit-Date
https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB11161
“PEGs act as non-ionic surfactant to decrease surface tension and thus enhance the diffusion of other molecules or drugs through the skin.”
((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate) also known as ALC-0315 or simply ALC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ALC-0315
ALC was patented in 2018.
N,N-di(tetradecyl)acetamide, (DTDA)
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/N_N-Di_tetradecyl_acetamide
Molecular Formula: C30H61NO
Scroll down the page to Patents view this description:
This patented GMO chemical was initially created in 1997 and was updated in 2018. In plain English, It is a fat-based carrier molecule (nanoparticle) to transport mRNA (messenger nucleic acid) to cells.
1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (aka DSPC)
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/1_2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine
Molecular Formula: C44H88NO8P
Scroll down to patents to see the patent history. There are more than 7,000 patents on this extremely complex molecule including a corona virus vaccine patent on February 27, 2020. It seems odd that this GMO shot was created before there was even a handful of claimed fatalities in the US.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/1-2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine
This article describes various ways that DSPC is combined with PEG, DTDA and ALC to form a missile with a positively charged head to attack and break through the negatively charged cell membrane. Below is an image showing how complex the structure is of these new GMO molecules:
Why the New GMO Shots will Harm your Immune System
There is a reason the drug peddlers excluded people with a history of autoimmune problems from their drug trials. The reason is that the new GMO shots are intended to hyper-activate your immune response. People with autoimmune problems already suffer from a hyperactive immune system (likely due to previous drugs they were subjected to by the drug peddlers). In some ways, these GMO shots are actually more dangerous than the corona virus.
The first difference is that the GMO shots are injected through your skin. The corona virus has to pass through your mouth, nose and lungs. You body knows this which is why your body places its “first line of defense” in the mouth, nose and lungs.
The second difference is that the GMO shots are hidden inside of a GMO missile to help them pass through your cell wall defenses. Real viruses do not have the assistance of a GMO missile.
The third difference is that the GMO shot mRNA is a combination of several difference gene sequences that have been patched together to form a “Frankenstein” monster.
Here are some quotes about the new GMO shots from various doctors:
“These vaccines violate the Nurembourg Code on Medical Experimentation, and violate basic international law. We have a human right under this law, not to take these ‘frankenshots’ – and I refuse to take them!”
Dr. Francis Boyle
If we were honest with this, we would actually call it what it is: it is a chemical pathogen device, that is actually meant to unleash a chemical pathogen production action within the cell. It is a medical device, not a drug, because it meets the CDRH [Center for Devices and Radiological Health] definition of a device.
Dr. David Martin
“It’s a synthetic pathogen. They’ve literally injected this pathogenic part of the virus into every cell of the body … it can actually directly cause multiple sclerosis, Lou Gehrig’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease … it can cause accelerated cancer
Dr. Judy Mikovits
https://www.globalresearch.ca/mrna-covid-vaccine-not-vaccine/5734464
The following is an image from Moderna, maker of one of the GMO shots describing how their new GMO shot alters genes in your body:
The GMO shot is an operating system which can program your DNA. Moderna states on their website that their mRNA technology platform is a “software of life” and “functions very much like an operating system on a computer.”: “It is designed so that it can plug and play interchangeably with different programs. In our case, the “program” or “app” is our mRNA drug – the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein.” https://www.modernatx.com/mrna-technology/mrna-platform-enabling-drug-discovery-development
Are the GMO Shots a Biological Warfare Weapon?
In a report published on January 18, 2021, Dr. Bart Classen reviewed some of the long term risks of the new GMO shots. He concluded that the GMO shots could create pathologic prions which in turn are known to cause ALS, frontal lobe degeneration, Alzheimers disease and other neurological degenerative diseases. He concluded that the GMO shots could be a type of biological weapon.
https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/covid19-rna-based-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-prion-disease-1503.pdf
Here are some quotes from this article:
“Approving a vaccine, utilizing novel RNA technology without extensive testing is extremely dangerous.”
“Vaccines have been found to cause a host of chronic, late developing adverse events. Some adverse events like type 1 diabetes may not occur until 3-4 years after a vaccine is administered.”
RNA based vaccines offers special risks of inducing specific adverse events. One such potential adverse event is prion based diseases.” Gene sequences in the GMO shots “may cause TDP-43 or FUS to take their pathologic configurations in the cytoplasm.”
“Over the last two decades there has been a concern among certain scientists that prions could be used as bioweapons. More recently there has been a concern that intracellular molecules could be activated to cause prion disease including Alzheimer’s disease, ALS and other neurodegenerative diseases. This concern originates due to potential for misuse of research data on the mechanisms by which certain RNA binding proteins like TDP-43, FUS and others can be activated to form disease causing prions. The fact that this research, which could be used for bioweapons development, is funded by private organizations including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, without national/international oversight is also a concern.”
“The current analysis indicates Pfizer's RNA based COVID-19 vaccine contains many of these RNA sequences that have been shown to have high affinity for TDP-43 or FUS and have the potential to induce chronic degenerative neurological diseases.”
“Another related concern is that the Pfizer vaccine uses a unique RNA nucleoside 1-methyl-3'-pseudouridylyl (aka Ψ). According to FDA briefing documents, this nucleoside was chosen to reduce activation of the innate immune system. See
Pfizer-Biotech: COVID-19 Vaccine (BNT162, PF-07302048), Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Briefing Document. Meeting Date: 10 December 2020. 92 pages.”
https://www.fda.gov/media/144246/download
Note: This artificial substitution nucleoside hides the GMO shot mRNA from the immune system which would otherwise destroy it. But the fact that it is a substitution creates real problems for human cells – much in the same way that fake cheese presents problems for our digestive system.
Scientific basis for concern about Autoimmune Disease
Here are quotes from the study about the risk of autoimmune disease.
“Autoimmunity can also be induced by epitope spreading when a foreign antigen, like the spike protein, is presented by an antigen presenting cell that also has self molecules attached to its MHC molecules.”
“Autoimmunity and the opposing condition, metabolic syndrome, are well know adverse events caused by vaccines.” See for example:
Classen JB. Review of Vaccine Induced Immune Overload and the Resulting Epidemics of Type 1 Diabetes... and other Immune Mediated Diseases. J Mol Genet Med. 2014; S1: 025
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0f41/10eee333040e0cf988db2cd4c138484e1f2f.pdf?_ga=2.155331128.2085298092.1612919607-1095542927.1612919607
“COVID-19 infections are associated with the induction of autoantibodies and autoimmune disease making it more than plausible a vaccine could do the same.” See for example:
Wang EY, Mao T, Klein J, et al. Diverse functional autoantibodies in patients with COVID-19. medRxiv preprint. December 11 2020.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.10.20247205v1.full.pdf
The above 37 page study provides evidence that corona virus patients, in worst cases, exhibit a disfunctional or hyper-activation or over-activation of the human immune system. In other words, some people have a pre-existing immune system problem that prevents their immune system from properly dealing with the corona virus.
The concern of Dr. Classen is that because the GMO shots are designed to increase the immune response, getting the shot may actually make the immune response worse for people who already have a hyper active immune response. I agree with Dr. Classen.
#8 The Greed and Corruption Factor
Call me old-fashioned, but when a drug company has been convicted of killing people by the thousands just to make a buck, it is time to put that company out of business – not put them in charge of economic and health policies for the entire US.
2008 FTC Corruption crashes the stock market – causing millions of people to lose their jobs and homes – so big banks can make hundreds of billions of dollars gambling with our life savings.
2019: FAA Corruption crashes airplanes – causing hundreds of people to die - so Boeing can make hundreds of billions of dollars selling planes with engines that are too big to fit under the wings.
2020 CDC Corruption crashes the economy – causing millions of people to die – so drug companies can make hundreds of billions of dollars scaring people into accepting universal forced vaccinations.
My Mother: “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.”
What we are witnessing is a take over of the US government by wealthy multinational corporations who rob from the US tax payers in order to line the pockets of billionaires. This is not capitalism. It is unbridled greed and extreme political corruption. The real threat to your health is believing that the CDC is your friend.
Here are three facts I hope you will consider:
#1 Drug companies are the leading contributors to the Mass Hysteria Media. Without billions in bribes from drug companies, nearly every newspaper, radio station and TV station would go broke. Drug companies pour $25 billion dollars a year into advertising on the US mass media. The US is the only nation in the world that allows drug companies to push their drugs on television. As a direct result of outright dishonest drug company propaganda on TV, nearly 50% of the American people are now hooked on Prescription drugs – often taking several different drugs every single day. More Americans will die from adverse reactions to prescription drugs this year than will die from the corona virus! https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/drug-use-therapeutic.htm
#2: Drug companies are also the leading contributors to corrupt politicians. Without billions in bribes from drug companies, most politicians would not have the money needed to buy their re-election. There are more drug company lobbyists than Congressmen and Senators combined. Drug companies give double the amount of bribes (aka donations) as oil and gas companies. Drug companies contribute four times what defense and aerospace give to corrupt politicians. In the past twenty years, the drug industry has spent over $3.7 billion lobbying (aka bribing) government officials. This is why drug companies now own Congress.
#3 Corrupt out of control drug companies also own the CDC. “The four companies that produce all 72 vaccines that are mandated for American children, all four of them are convicted felons. Since 2009, those four companies collectively have paid $35 billion dollars in criminal penalties for defrauding regulators, for falsifying science, for bribing doctors, for lying to the public, and killing lots of people.”
Robert Kennedy Jr. January 30, 2020
The real purpose of the CDC is to help drug companies make hundreds of billions of dollars each year peddling dangerous unproven miracle cures to the American people. The CDC is one of the least trustworthy, most dishonest and most corrupt agencies in the federal government – with a long track record of approving drugs and vaccines that later kill people by the hundreds of thousands.
Did you know that Congress passed a law prohibiting people from suing drug companies over damages and deaths caused by vaccines? No matter how toxic the ingredients, how negligent the manufacturer or how devastating the harm their vaccines inflect on our children, parents of injured children cannot sue a vaccine company.
Did you know that, each year, more than 2 million Americans suffer serious adverse reactions from FDA-approved drugs. These side effects lead to about 100,000 deaths, according to a 2016 study published in The International Journal of Health Services. https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-04-07-00260.pdf
Did you know that most vaccines now on the CDC recommended childhood vaccine schedule were safety tested for only a few days or weeks? For example, the manufacturer’s package insert discloses that Merck’s Hep B vaccine (almost every American infant receives a Hep B shot on the day of birth) underwent, not five years, but a mere five days of safety testing. If the babies in these studies had a seizure—or died—on day six, Merck was under no obligation to disclose those facts.
Did you know that the CDC functions as a vaccine company with a budget of $11- billion per year. (while Americans spend $5 billion a year buying vaccines at inflated prices?
In addition to making $60 billion per year selling vaccines, drug companies make an additional $500 billion selling medications for diseases the vaccines cause.
Did you know that Global vaccine market revenues nearly double from 2014 to 2020?
https://www.pharmaceuticalprocessingworld.com/global-vaccine-market-revenue-to-reach-59-2-billion-by-2020/
Anyone who does not think we have a greed and corruption problem with a revolving door between the CDC and drug companies is simply not paying attention.
#9 The Mutation Problem
Even if the GMO shots did reduce corona risk in some way, there is no doubt these GMO shots will become less effective over time because all viruses mutate rapidly over time.
Three Reasons all Viral Genes Mutate Extremely Rapidly
There are three main reasons all viruses change so rapidly – and in fact are capable of changing as much as is needed. First, the populations of viruses are extremely large – on the order of millions to billions in any given epidemic. Second, all viruses replicate extremely rapidly. There can be hundreds of generations of viruses in a single epidemic. Third, all viruses have extremely high mutation rates. Every mutation, which helps the virus to evade the host immune system, or helps the virus evade a vaccine, will be positively selected, passed on to the next generation, and distribute the mutation more widely. So the idea that some magic vaccine is going to permanently fool the corona virus is simply not very honest. The corona virus will mutate even more rapidly once it faces the challenge of whatever billion dollar vaccine we throw up against it. There is almost no doubt that within a matter of weeks, it will mutate enough to evade the vaccine – and there goes a billion dollars – and once again we will be faced with mass isolation “to protect the ones we love.”
#10 A Better Option… Helping your Natural Immune System
We humans are exposed to millions of bacteria and viruses every day. Yet somehow we have managed to survive – whether we use social distancing or not. How do we survive all of these constant attacks?
One answer is that we actually have deadly viruses inside of us all the time. For example, in 2014 researchers from Washington University in St. Louis found that our bodies are home to an average of five virus families responsible for numerous illnesses. The researchers identified adenoviruses – responsible for viral pneumonia and the common cold – in the majority of samples. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/282751
So the notion that we “catch” the flu or “catch” a cold from someone else is not entirely accurate. It is likely that we already have bad viruses inside of us. But most of the time our immune system is able to fight these viruses off. So when we do get sick, it could just as easily be because our immune system was not working as well as it had been the day before.
How does our immune system fight the corona virus?
It is likely that many more people are exposed to the corona virus than the official cases indicate. But their immune system has been able to fight the corona virus off due to some past experience with a similar virus.
I am not the only one who thinks it is better to strengthen the immune system than to force social isolation. On March 10, 2020, Steven Hotze, M. D., posted an article that also questioned the current Corona Virus hysteria. Here is a quote from his article:
“To build a healthy immune system, I recommend an “ABCDZ program” to my patients, consisting of high doses of Vitamin A and B complex, vitamin C and Vitamin D3, and Zinc. This will help prevent them from getting the flu, corona virus, or any other viral or bacterial infection. Use common-sense hygiene, like washing your hands. “
https://www.intellectualtakeout.org/article/coronavirus-mass-hysteria
There is strong scientific research supporting the claim that these vitamins can improve your immune system. They not only protect you from the corona virus – they also protect you from the normal flu and a host of other illnesses.
Low vitamin D levels are linked to respiratory infections and increase susceptibility to influenza. Exercise and going outdoors is also good. Staying indoors and hiding under your blanket is not good for you or for the economy.
Here is a three step plan to improve your immune system and lung functioning:
#1 Exercise Twice a Day for at least 30 consecutive minutes
Exercise is perhaps the most effective thing you can do to improve your cardiovascular function and thereby strengthen your immune system. This is why it was so crazy for clueless government officials to close parks, ban basketball games and shut down local gyms. It would have been much better for the government to give everyone a free gym membership and encourage them to turn off the TV and get out of the house. Several studies have shown that about 90% of all corona cases come from people locked in their homes.
#2 Quit Smoking
The primary way people are killed by the corona virus is through viral pneumonia which is an infection of the lower lungs. The healthier your lungs are the more likely your immune system is to fight off the corona virus. One of the reason that many more men than women died from the corona virus in China was because many more men smoke in China than women. About 54% of men smoke in China but only 3% of women. Thus, women have less damaged lungs and are better able to fight off the virus. Ironically, this smoking connection is almost never mentioned by the Mass Hysteria Media. One possible reason children have fewer problems with the corona virus than adults is because their lungs are less damaged.
#3 Lobby for better air quality in your community
One of the main reasons that many more people died in China and Northern Italy is that those areas both suffered from extremely low air quality. Poor air quality can do permanent damage to the lungs much like smoking does. If you want to save lives, then advocate for better air quality in your local community.
Conclusion
If our corrupt government really wanted to save lives, instead of subjecting us to expensive GMO shots, they would pass out free vitamin C and D packets and encourage everyone to go out for a walk instead of forcing all of us to stay locked up in our homes. Instead of taking the GMO shot, people should focus on improving their immune system.
About the Author
David Spring M. Ed. has a Bachelor’s Degree in Science Education from Washington State University with Minors in Math and Chemistry and a Masters Degree from the University of Washington. This article was published on February 8, 2021.