3.5 Examples of Social Isolation Fake Science

What about all the Media Claims that there is Scientific Evidence that Social Isolation Works???

Here are some typical claims made by the Mass Hysteria Media:

There is plenty of scientific evidence to support the use of social distancing.

“Numerous studies have demonstrated that social distancing measures can be very effective in slowing the spread of respiratory viruses and reducing the number of people who ultimately get infected.”

Social distancing can flatten the curve and reduce the strain on our medical system.”

Sadly, almost never do any of these claims link to any scientific study that supports the claims they are making. When they do link to a study, it is often the discredited 2020 Ferguson study or the discredited 2007 Ferguson study.

While there has not been a single credible scientific study that actually shows that Social Isolation works, there are almost every day, a new wave of fake science studies claiming that social isolation works. These fake science studies are then promoted by the Mass Hysteria Media to help keep folks locked up in their houses. In this section, we will take a closer look at a few of these fake science studies with the hope that it will help you better understand the difference between real science and fake science.

Now for our lineup of fake science articles.

#1 Our first fake science article is called Pandemics Depress the Economy, Public Health Interventions Do Not.

Here is a link to this article: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=3561560

The article is 40 pages long.

Red Flag #1 is that the authors of this article work for the US Federal Reserve Bank. The purpose of the article is to reassure the public that the economy is not being destroyed by the current extreme social isolation policies (despite the fact that more than 30 million jobs have been lost in just the past 6 weeks) - and that social isolation policies are working to stop the corona virus. To prove their point, they looked at social isolation efforts made by 43 cities during the 1918 Spanish Flu epidemic.

Red Flag #2 is that they referred to the discredited Ferguson 2007 study.

Red Flag #3 is their claim that more aggressive social isolation policies not only saved lives – but also led to improved economic performance after the pandemic was over. Here is a quote from the study: “We find that cities that intervened earlier and more aggressively do not perform worse and, if anything, grow faster after the pandemic is over. Our findings thus indicate that NPIs not only lower mortality; they may also mitigate the adverse economic consequences of a pandemic.”

Perhaps the most important chart in the entire study was a chart showing that the Spanish Flu and Pneumonia fatalities during the 1918 epidemic were directly related to the Pneumonia fatalities the year before in 1917. Here is the chart:

32

Although the authors of the study did not realize it or attempt to explain this chart, the reason there was a relationship between city location and illnesses is that some cities have better air quality and more healthy people with better immune systems than other cities. It is also obvious from the above chart that we could predict Spanish Flu fatalities in 1918 simply by multiplying the 2017 pneumonia fatalities times three. In other words, the 1918 Spanish Flu fatalities had nothing to do with the social isolation policies of each city and instead had to do with the immune systems of the populations in each city. In short, the above graph is strong evidence that the claim they attempt to make in their study is false. I think anyone with a pair of eyes and a couple of functioning brain cells can see that.

Did I mention that the Federal Reserve is not part of the federal government – and that it has no reserves? What it really represents are Wall Street banks!

The moral here is to always look at the actual data rather than what the authors are saying about the data. This concludes our first fake study. Now on to the next one.

#2 Our next fake science article, released in April 2020, was called: “Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Non healthcare Settings—Social Distancing Measures”
This article was a review of 50 scientific studies which supposedly confirmed the effectiveness of social distancing policies in minimizing the spread of flu epidemics. Here is the link so you can read it yourself. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0995_article

Here was the ending of their abstract:

“We conducted systematic reviews of the evidence base for effectiveness of multiple mitigation measures: isolating ill persons, contact tracing, quarantining exposed persons, school closures, workplace measures/closures, and avoiding crowding. Evidence supporting the effectiveness of these measures was obtained largely from observational studies and simulation studies. Voluntary isolation at home might be a more feasible social distancing measure, and pandemic plans should consider how to facilitate this measure. More drastic social distancing measures might be reserved for severe pandemics.”

As I had not seen a single study supporting the effectiveness of social distancing, I looked forward to reading the 50 studies. Sadly, 21 of the so-called studies were simply computer simulations where they assumed social distancing worked and then found that their computer model agreed with their assumption. What a surprise. I want to make it clear that computer simulations should NEVER be lumped together with real scientific studies.

The remaining 29 observational studies actually refuted the contention that social distancing worked.

Here was a Table of the 50 studies divided by type of intervention.

Type of NPI

# studies

study design (1)

Main Findings

Isolation

15

4 O 11 S

 Isolation has moderate impact in reducing influenza transmission and impact.

Quarantine

16

1 I 5 O 10 S

Quarantine has low impact in reducing influenza transmission and impact.

Contact Tracing

4

4s

contact tracing provides only modest benefit but will need substantial resources.

School Closure

---

---

see three types below

Planned holiday

28

o

transmission of influenza decreases during routine school holidays but increases after schools reopen.

reactive closures

16

o

The effectiveness of reactive school closure varies.

pre-emptive closures

13

o

Preemptive school closure has moderate impact in reducing influenza transmission.

Workplace closure

10

s

Workplace closures has only modest impact in reducing influenza transmission.

Avoiding crowds

3

o

Timely and sustained application of measures to avoid crowding might reduce influenza transmission.

Total

50*

29-O 21S

*Some studies had results in more than one category.

(1) O = Observational, I = Intervention S = Simulation

Here is a quote from the Conclusion section of their study:

“We found limited scientific evidence to support the effectiveness of this intervention in the community. Assuming that a high level of compliance with home isolation is possible for symptomatic persons, voluntary home isolation could be a preferable strategy to prevent onward transmission compared with other personal protective measures, which have not shown effectiveness in multiple randomized controlled trials.”

Put in plain English, this review of 50 studies was able to only find “limited” evidence. We will see from my own review that the word “limited” is not accurate. In fact, there was NO evidence in any of the studies that social isolation works with the general population.

Here are my notes from reviewing the observational studies in the the above table:

Quarantine studies
This category included 1 intervention, 5 observational studies and 10 simulation studies. I only reviewed the single intervention and the 5 observational studies. These were references 4 and 18 to 22.

The intervention study used a control group company against an experimental group company where employees could voluntarily stay at home on receiving full pay when a household member showed development of influenza-like illness until days after the symptoms subside. The intervention backfired because many more people in the intervention group got sick by staying home than did not get sick at work due to the absence of the worker. The conclusion was that home quarantine was not a good idea because it actually increase the number of flu victims. None of the 5 observational studies provided evidence supporting quarantine measures other than quarantine of the the actual flu victims.

School Dismissals or Closures
School dismissal refers to the situation where a school campus remains open with administrative staff and teachers present but most children stay at home. School closure is a stricter intervention in which a school campus is closed to all children and all staff.

School closures do reduce flu spreading slightly during a closure. However, transmission returns to the rate it would have been once the school re-opens. Thus, there is not a significant difference in the total number of victims.

None of the reviewed studied had any bearing on the corona virus because all of them assumed that children would be the main carriers of the flu virus. In fact, with the corona virus, there are very few confirmed cases under the age of 18.

Here is a quote from one of the studies:

“There is no consensus on the scale of the benefits to be expected, and recent reviews highlighted the lack of evidence for social distancing measures such as school closure.”

Another study just confirmed the importance of hand washing.

Here is a quote from a 2006 study:

“Ill persons should remain home when they first become symptomatic, but forced isolation and quarantine are ineffective and impractical. If the pandemic is severe, social distancing measures such as school closures should be considered.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16494723?dopt=Abstract

There was one study with actual evidence. It was a comparison of a school closure in Hong Kong one year to when schools were not closed in a different year. The study “ detected no significant effect of school closure on influenza spread in this outbreak.” Here is the link: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(09)70176-8/fulltext#back-bib4

Below is a graph comparing the flu illnesses in the closure year (2007) to the non-closure year (2008):

33

It is pretty obvious that the closure did not effect the total number of infections. Three other studies estimated that reactive school closures had no effect in reducing the total attack rate and duration of school outbreaks, and the spread of influenza (3436).

Here is a quote from another study which had no real data but argued against school closures: “School closures can also have adverse impacts on ethical and social equity, particularly among vulnerable groups (e.g., low-income families). Extended school closures might increase contact rates in households and other social gatherings (e.g., malls, theaters), with the potential to increase transmission in the community.”

That’s it for the second fake study. Now for the third.

#3 A third study claims to provide evidence that social isolation works On April 6, 2020, another study was published claiming to prove that social isolation policies work – and predicting mass deaths if the social isolation policies are lifted too soon. The study was called Quantifying the Effect of Quarantine Control in Covid 19 Infectious Spread. Here is a link to this study: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.03.20052084v1.full.pdf

Let’s look at the evidence they provide to back up their claims.

Red flag #1 is that this study is using machine learning. In other words, it is a computer simulation. As I noted above, computer simulations suffer from the problem of “Garbage In, Garbage Out.” But because of the claims they are making, we will still review this study.

Red Flag #2 is that one of their first citations is the discredited 2020 Ferguson report.

Red Flag #3 was their claim that South Korea “adopted drastic generalized quarantine. This resulted in apparent recession of the spread in South Korea.” Their statement is simply false. There was not a mandatory generalized quarantine in South Korea like there was in China.

Red Flag #4 was their claim that the response in the US was “delayed.” (they then claim the delay led to explosive growth of infections and fatalities). In fact, infections and fatalities in the US are much less than in many countries in Europe that implemented immediate lock downs.

Red Flag #5: They claimed that the US is somehow the worst responder in the world. Here is a quote from their shoddily written study: “As of April 2 2020, the United States has the highest number of infected cases (∼ 227k) globally.”

Do you spot the error? They never adjusted for population. At the time, the US was at 30 deaths per million while many countries in Europe were over 100 deaths per million – three times worse than the US in terms of cases per million and deaths per million.

Red Flag #6: Their machine learning model completely ignores the role of our natural immune system in bending the curve of the virus. All effects are attributed to social isolation policies. No attempt was made to isolate the two factors. Therefore, since all gains in their computer model were due to social isolation, they predict that the virus will take off again once social isolation is ended.

In short, they simply ignore our natural immune system. And this is the kind of fake science that is being used to justify locking down the entire US. Wow. There is simply no scientific research that supports any social isolation policies.

That’s it for the third study. Now for our fourth and final study.

#4 This is not actually a study. It is much worse. It is a YouTube video made by a doctor in Texas and viewed by more than 15 million people. My daughter sent it to me and wanted to know what was wrong with it. Here is a link to the 30 minute video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4J0d59dd-qM

Sadly, even though the person making the video is a doctor, he made several basic mistakes indicating he knows very little about the human immune system.

His first mistake was at minute 3 when he said that “because it is a new virus, no one has any immunity to it.” This is not true. While the corona virus is new, it is similar enough to other corona viruses, such as the common cold, that about half of all people exposed to it will not get it because they already have a natural immunity to it.

He also seems to be unaware of the research on asymptomatic carriers – which confirms that for every reported case, there are at least 50 asymptomatic cases (see the video I just posted to my Facebook page).

He is also wrong at minute 4 in claiming that “20% of people who get the corona virus will need to be hospitalized.” What he should have said was 20% of confirmed cases will need to be hospitalized.” (the number is actually 10% of confirmed cases).

But in ignoring the huge number of asymptomatic cases, he makes a fool out of himself. The real percent that will need to be hospitalized is 10% divided by 50 = 2 in one thousand actual cases or one in 500 cases. This makes the corona virus exactly like the seasonal flu in terms of risk of hospitalization (and risk of death).

Again at minute 4, because he ignores the issue of asymptomatic cases, he greatly over-estimates the percent that will need to be in the ICU or on respirators (by a factor of 50).

His conclusion that we do not have enough respirators is simply wrong. In fact, we have at least twice the number of respirators that we will need even when the epidemic is at its peak. Sadly, this doctor simply failed to “do the math.”

He then is wrong in his analysis of how corona virus kills people – as most claimed victims to not actually die from the corona virus.

He is correct in claiming at minute 5 that fatalities are linked to high blood pressure and obesity. He is wrong in claiming that over 40 is at risk. The press reports on this have not been accurate. It is still age 70 that is the huge increase in risk and even age 70 is not a risk unless you have other medical problems such as cardiovascular problems.

He is also wrong in his claim that if a person sneezes and you are within 6 feet, “You have a very good chance of catching it” In fact, we know that it takes a high concentration of the virus to get infected. Mere exposure to the virus does not lead to infection. Even then, you will only catch it if your immune system is compromised in some way. His claims are basically fear mongering on a massive scale. Your actual odds of catching it are well under 10% and your odds of dying if you do catch it are less than one in one thousand.

He then spends about 10 minutes explaining just one of many pathways that people have been killed supposedly by the corona virus replication process. He fails to recognize that many supposed corona virus victims were never even tested for the corona virus and are likely to have died from bacterial pneumonia – which is different from pulmonary edema or viral pneumonia. The differences are important because the treatment for these three medical conditions is different. As just one example, putting someone on a respiratory may not be the best course of action if the respirator increases the pressure in the lungs too much. A better course of action may be supplemental oxygen combined with antibiotics. See the following link for more information on differences in treatment: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513286/

At minute 21, he states that 3% of cases will die. Again, because he ignores the research on asymptomatic cases, the real number is 5% divided by 50 which is 1 person in one thousand.

He is correct at minute 24 in saying half the time when people are put on a ventilator, they do not survive. But at least some of this problem is misunderstanding what is happening in the lungs. If the lungs are still healthy, some doctors now believe that there may be other better options and that the ventilator itself might make the breathing problem worse. See for example, Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell, emergency room doctor from NYC in this video: https://vimeo.com/402537849

At minute 25, he again makes the mistake of claiming that there are not enough ventilators. This is because he over-estimates the number of people who will need ventilators by at least a factor of 50 to 80. He wants us to “trust him.” But sadly, he failed to research these issues before he made the video.

He then recites case numbers without any research into whether the case numbers or fatalities are accurate. In fact, we have known all along that the case numbers and fatalities are extremely inaccurate for a whole bunch of reasons.

He then states at minute 26 that Italy has a 10% death rate from the corona virus. This is simply ridiculous. But because this guy is a doctor, people will believe that what he is saying is true. In fact, he will be eventually proven to bee wrong. This is why a lot of people no longer trust doctors. It is because too many doctors go public with opinions when they have failed to do any kind of research.

At minute 27, he then talks about doctors dying from the corona virus. I am sure doctors have died. I have seen no evidence that what they died from was the corona virus. Science requires that we demand some actual objective evidence before accepting claims.

He then claims that we will not hit the peak until Mid May. In fact, we now know that the peak was hit about April 20, 2020. So he is off by at least one month. This is why scientific research is important. There is no research that supports a peak of Mid May – much less the peak used in the Ferguson report of Mid-June.

He then uses a doubling ratio of every three days. Research has shown that the doubling period is about every 6 days. So this fear mongering doctor is distorting facts almost with every sentence.

He then at minute 19 claims that because you did not take this seriously, your grandmother is going to die.

In fact, the person who did not take this seriously enough to do any research is this doctor. And because of his fear mongering video, government officials will shut down our economy which will cause 300,000 people. In short, he and the people who listen to them will cause death on a massive scale. All because they failed to do any research and knew nothing about our immune system.

He then claims that “we do not have a treatment for this.” In fact, Vitamins C and D have been found to be effective treatments as have transfusions of corona virus antibodies. Again, he has done no research.

At minute 33, he then falsely claims that we are worse off than Italy or Spain. This is ridiculous. As of April 18, 2020, deaths per million in Italy is 358. Deaths per million in Spain is 409. Deaths per million in the US is 101. The problem in Italy and Spain is three times worse than it is in the US. But because he is a doctor, people will believe him without ever bothering to check out the facts.

The take away from this is first, do not listen to someone simply because they are a doctor. Do your own research. Second. we need to do a much better job teaching doctors about how the immune system works.

The Real Crisis has been Empty Hospitals
Here is a quote from a May 4, 2020 Global Research article:

“Aside from New York, nationally there’s been no health system crisis. In fact, to be truly correct, there has been a health system crisis, but the crisis is that the hospitals are empty. This is true in Florida where the lockdown was late, this is true in southern California where the lockdown was early, it’s true in Oklahoma where there is no statewide lockdown. There doesn’t seem to be any correlation between the lockdown and whether or not the epidemic has spread wide and fast.”

What’s Next?
How can we account for this hard to understand but scientifically proven result that mass gatherings are extremely safe? The answer is in having a better understanding of the extremely complex relationship between viruses and the human immune system. Let’s look at recent studies that are finally shedding some light on what is really going on between humans and viruses (including all strains of flu viruses and cold viruses).

 

3.4 Evidence Mass Gatherings do not increase Flu Epidemics

You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”
New Testament Book of John, Chapter 8, Verse 32

Ten Years of Research on Millions of Mass Gatherings involving hundreds of millions of people found not a single flu fatality!
On Monday, March 16, the Governor of Washington State announced he was shutting down all restaurants, bars and gyms and prohibiting all gatherings of more than 50 people and most gatherings of less than 50 people – effectively shutting down all sporting events and social conferences and almost any kinds of meetings. This was in addition to the previous week when he shut down all 2000 public schools and all colleges and Universities in Washington state.

These draconian shut downs caused more than one million people to lose their jobs and severely harmed the education of more than one million school children and hundreds of thousands of college students. We have already seen there is no benefit to these shutdowns – other than delaying the time of the peak week.

But the Mass Hysteria Media says we need to use Social Distancing to Flatten the Curve. Surely they would not be advising us to do something that crashes the economy and costs working families billions of dollars unless there was some benefit?

What is the evidence about the effect of shutting down mass gatherings? Shutting down mass gatherings was also tried in the 1918 Spanish Flu epidemic. As we have already seen, this method did not reduce either total fatalities or the peak of fatalities in 1918.

Here we will look at further evidence confirming that mass gatherings do not increase flu outbreaks. Therefore shutting down these mass gatherings does not reduce flu outbreaks. It is simply a myth.

Evidence that Mass Gatherings during the 2009 Swine Flu Outbreak did not increase Flu Cases or Flu Fatalities
There were two studies on this important topic using two slightly different methods. Both studies reached the same conclusion which was that mass gatherings did not increase flu outbreaks. The biggest health problem found by both studies related to social gatherings was the presence of food poisoning at large state and county fairs. Here is the first study: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0186730&type=printable

Frequency and characteristics of respiratory disease outbreaks at mass gatherings in the United States
“We administered an online assessment to the 50 state health departments and 31 large local health departments in the United States to gather information about mass gathering-related respiratory disease outbreaks occurring between 2009 and 2014. Outbreaks ranged from 5 to 150 reported cases. Of the 43 respondents, 9 jurisdictions used nonpharmaceutical interventions (including social distancing) to slow or prevent disease transmission. Although respiratory disease outbreaks with a large number of cases occur at many types of mass gatherings, our assessment suggests that such outbreaks may be uncommon, even during the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic.”

“There are more than 14,000 residential camps and nearly 2 million mass meetings in the US each year involving more than 1000 people. CDC routinely recommends that state and local health departments implement a variety of nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), including hand hygiene, respiratory etiquette, and environmental surface cleaning, to reduce disease transmission in mass gatherings. During a severe pandemic, CDC may recommend social distancing and postponing or canceling mass gatherings.”

“We estimate: 1) the number of mass gathering-related respiratory disease outbreaks reported from 2009 to 2014, 2) the etiologies of the outbreaks, and 3) the characteristics of the mass gatherings. Although a mass gathering was defined as a congregation of 1,000 or more persons in either an indoor or an outdoor venue for a common purpose, we included all outbreaks reported in response to the assessment regardless of the gathering’s size.”

“Of the 18 reported mass gathering-related outbreaks, 3 occurred in 2009, one in 2010, 2 in 2011, 11 in 2012, and 1 in 2013. All outbreaks involved multi-day gatherings. Most (94%) involved influenza A and occurred at fairs, camps, religious gatherings, a conference-related social gathering, and a sporting event. Outbreaks ranged in size from 5 to 150 reported cases. State and county fairs had the highest number of cases. Average fair attendance was 95,200 persons.. The number of cases reported from these outbreaks ranged from 3 to 138 and occurred across all age groups.”

My conclusions from the first study: The total number of mass events in the US each year is in the millions. Less than one percent of these events have any health risk. If you go to a county fair, your chances of getting the flu are one in a thousand. This is mainly if you eat food at the fair. The so-called “sporting event” was actually a dog show where 100 people out of 1100 dog handlers got the flu. There were no fatalities at any of these mass meeting events and not even reports of people going to the hospital. The most recommended precaution was health departments encouraging people to wash their hands.

Here is a link to the second study which was a 10 year study on health concerns about mass events: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0160378&type=printable

Mass Gatherings and Respiratory Disease Outbreaks in the United States —Should We Be Worried? Results from a Systematic Literature Review and Analysis of the National Outbreak Reporting System. Published August 18 2016

“We conducted a systematic literature review to identify articles about mass gathering related respiratory disease outbreaks occurring in the United States from 2005 to 2014. Because mass gatherings might create environments conducive for infectious disease transmission, public health officials may recommend postponing or canceling large gatherings during a moderate or severe pandemic. Despite these recommendations, limited empirical information exists on the frequency and characteristics of mass gathering-related respiratory disease outbreaks occurring in the United States.”

“To the best of our knowledge, this is the first effort to describe the frequency and characteristics of mass gathering-related respiratory disease outbreaks occurring in the United States. Mass gathering-related respiratory disease outbreaks appeared to be relatively rare during our 10-year project period.”

Mass gatherings can be defined as large events involving more than 1,000 persons in a specific location for a shared purpose. We identified 72 different mass gathering-related respiratory disease outbreaks. Of these, 1 occurred in 2005, 3 in 2007, 27 in 2009, 1 in 2011, 40 in 2012, and none in 2013 or 2014. More than half of the 72 identified outbreaks occurred at state or county agricultural fairs. All of these fairs were large multi-day events ranging between 5 to 12 days.”

“National Outbreak Reporting System (NORS): Between 2009 and 2013, 1,114 flu outbreaks were reported to NORS. None of these outbreaks was linked to mass gatherings in our analysis. No other respiratory disease outbreaks were reported to NORS. None of the outbreaks reported in this assessment involved single-day mass gatherings, although a majority of mass gatherings (e.g., sporting events, music concerts) attracting more than 100,000 participants in the United States are single-day events lasting a few hours.

This assessment suggests that respiratory disease outbreaks in mass gatherings are rare even during the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic.”

My conclusions from the second study: The biggest problem at these 1,114 mass gatherings reviewed by the second study was food poisoning (695 outbreaks). The health department needs to do a better job of testing the food at fairs. This problem does not justify shutting down all state and county fairs. If people do not want to risk getting sick at the county fair, they should simply not eat any of the food at the county fair. What is stunning about these two studies is that despite the millions of mass gatherings of more than one thousand people in the US each year, neither study was able to find any evidence that mass gatherings of more than one thousand people were related to a single major flu outbreak. So if gatherings of more than one thousand people are extremely safe, then gatherings of 50 people are even safer.

What’s Next?
Despite the massive research indicating that social isolation does not stop flu viruses, there have been a few studies claiming that social isolation works. In the next section, we will look at some of these examples of fake science.

3.3 Evidence Social Isolation Makes Flu Epidemics Worse

Ferguson claims that attempts in US cities to control fatalities during the 1918 Spanish Flu prove that social isolation works. In fact, they prove just the opposite. More social isolation led to more fatalities.

We have been told that Extreme Social Isolation is needed to reduce the spread of the Corona Virus. But there is no scientific evidence that extreme social isolation helps. In fact, as we will soon see, social isolation may even make the Corona Virus epidemic worse!

The following image is from a study published in the National Academy of Sciences in 2007. Here is a link to this study. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1849868/

The graph below claims that during the Spanish Flu epidemic of 1918, Philadelphia was a bad city that failed to practice social distancing resulting in the death of 4500 people. Meanwhile, St. Louis was a good city that “listened to health experts and told people to keep their distance from one another and avoid public places.”

26

The above graph is extremely misleading. The graph was taken from the 2007 Ferguson study of the social isolation actions of 16 cities in the 1918 Spanish Flu epidemic. There was a more complete study of 43 cities published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in August 2007. The study was called: Nonpharmaceutical Interventions Implemented by US Cities During the 1918-1919 Influenza Pandemic. Here is the link: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/208354

So what happened in the other 41 cities? Here is a table summarizing what happened in all 43 cities.

27

Most cities were good cities which shut down schools and public gatherings (34 cities out of 43). St. Louis shut down schools and public gatherings for 143 days. Note: 143 days consisted of shutting down schools for 10 weeks (70 days) and shutting down businesses and public gatherings for 10 weeks (another 70 days). So the study combined intervention days even though the shut downs ran concurrently. As a consequence of shutting every thing down for 10 weeks, the peak week for fatalities in St Louis was 30 per 100,000 and the total fatalities was 358 per 100,000.

The bad city, Philadelphia, only shut down schools and businesses for 100 days. This was only 7 weeks of school and business closures. Philadelphia had a peak week of 250 fatalities and a total of 750 fatalities per 100,000.

If you only look at these two cities, it sure looks like social distancing for 10 weeks is better than social distancing for 7 weeks. But what happens when you put all 43 cities on the same chart and looked at the Peak Week Death Rate for all 43 cities in the study instead of merely looking at the curves for St. Louis and Philadelphia?

Below is the graph for all 43 cities in terms of the social isolation actions they took in 1918 versus the peak weekly death rate:

28

Cities on the left side had more intervention days. Cities on the far right started their interventions later and had fewer days of interventions (fewer days of closing schools & closed businesses). The cities with the most interventions did manage to delay the Peak week of fatalities by 25 to 35 days. But the delay to the peak week of cases was about 7 days before the peak week of fatalities. Thus, the delay to peak week in cases was only 18 to 28 days (3 to 4 weeks).

Meanwhile, cities on the right suffered a peak week of fatalities in just 10 days from the first case being reported in that city. Thus, the peak in cases was reached in 3 days after the first reported case. So there appears to be an advantage to social distancing in delaying the time to the peak by about 3 to 4 weeks. But there was a heavy price to pay for this minor delay as is shown on the next chart.

29

The city with the fewest days of interventions, Grand Rapids Michigan, with only 60 days of interventions (shutting down schools and businesses for 30 days or about 4 weeks), also had the lowest total death rate of 200 fatalities per 100,000 population. Our “good city” St. Louis with a 10 week shut down had more than double the days of interventions and nearly double the number of fatalities.

But why were fatalities so high in Pittsburgh and Boston (700 to 800)? The answer is not, as Ferguson would have you believe, that they did not have enough days of interventions. Rather, it was because those two cities had the highest percent of returning soldiers from the end of World War One. The soldiers brought the Spanish Flu home with them. The more infected soldiers came to a town, the more deaths there were from the Spanish Flu. St. Louis was not a good city because it enforced an extended period of extreme social distancing. It was a good city because it had fewer returning soldiers in 1918.

As we noted earlier, the Spanish Flu was 200 times worse than the current Corona Virus. In the final months of 1918, it killed nearly 5000 people in Washington state. This was with a state population of 1.3 million. Since the current population is 7.5 million, Washington state would need to suffer nearly 29,000 fatalities to have a comparable outbreak in 2020. The reason the Spanish Flu was many times worse was because the trenches of World War One were extremely unsanitary and filled with exhausted troops with weakened immune systems. These trenches became a massive incubator for the Spanish Flu. When these infected troops returned home, they caused massive outbreaks all across the US.

Yet despite the fact that the 1918 flu outbreak was 200 times worse than the 2020 flu outbreak, schools in Washington state in 1918 were only closed 4 weeks. Meanwhile, schools in Washington state and the economy of Washington state are now closed for 8 weeks due to the much smaller Corona flu outbreak.

Given that there is no proven benefit to even one week of extreme social distancing, the closure of schools and businesses in Washington state for 11 weeks is basically a crime against our kids, our jobs, our families, our businesses and our economy.

Our economic problems will only get worse if schools and businesses are closed for a year or longer while our Governor and Superintendent wait for a miracle magic bullet vaccine.

There are several important reasons extreme social distancing was not an effective response to the severe flu outbreak in 1918 and will not be an effective response to this much more minor flu outbreak in 2020. These reasons have to do with how our immune system works. We will get into these reasons in a moment. But first, because there has been a massive amount of propaganda and false claims made on the benefits of extreme social distancing, let’s look at more scientific research on the lack of effectiveness of social distancing in reducing flu outbreaks.

Evidence that Social Isolation does not Flatten the Curve
Some media reports have acknowledged that Social Isolation does not lower the total number of deaths. But they claim social distancing will “flatten the curve” so that our hospitals are not overwhelmed with patients exceeding the capacity of hospitals to care for all the victims. Here is one of these Flatten the Curve charts:

30

We have already shown that US hospitals were not overwhelmed by the corona virus. In fact, at the peak, they were only at 7% of capacity. Here we will show that even if they were overwhelmed, social isolation would not have reduced the problem because it does not actually flatten the curve.

Sadly, the above chart is worse than misleading – it is a blatant lie. As we have just seen from the 2007 study of 43 cities, social distancing interventions may lengthen the time to the peak week – but social distancing does not shorten the height of the peak week. The chart makes it look like, unless we shut down schools and businesses, the number of cases will double and wipe out the health care system. But here is what actually happened to the “fatalities curve” in 1918 during the last major flu epidemic when cities with the most interventions were compared to the cities with the least interventions:

31

 

Note that the two cities that had the lowest public distancing (did the least interventions, and delayed the interventions the longest), also had the flattest curve!

Meanwhile, the city with the most interventions, New York City had a peak week fatality rate that was about double the rate of the cities that did the least intervention. Here is the exact information on these cities from the Appendix of this study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1849868/bin/pnas_0611071104_index.html

So the truth about interventions and curve flattening is the exact opposite of what you have been told by the Mass Hysteria Media. If anything, social distancing interventions INCREASE the height of the peak cases curve and the peak fatalities curve. This means that social isolation also increases the load on hospitals.

The reason for this has to do with how the human immune system works. We will explain this dynamic after we look at a few more scientific studies on social distancing.

What’s Next?
As another example of how much you are being lied to, let’s take an even more blatant lie- the claim that shutting down mass gatherings will reduce flu outbreaks. I know this may seem hard to believe. But there is a mountain of evidence that mass gatherings of even 1000 people do not increase flu epidemics. So the idea that gatherings of more than 50 people should be restricted is basically ridiculous and not supported by any scientific evidence.

3.2 Comparing Rates of Fatalities in States and Nations

The states with the most social distancing also have seen not only the most fatalities but also the greatest increase in fatalities.

In this section, we will first compare the corona virus fatality rates in states that mandated extreme social isolation policies to states with more moderate policies. We will then compare corona virus fatality rates in nations that mandated extreme social isolation policies to nations with more moderate policies. In every case, more social isolation increased fatalities.

Comparing US State Fatalities to Social Isolation Policies
The following table compares four states with early and extreme social isolation policies to three other states that are maintaining less drastic and more rational policies. Some states have employed much more draconian social isolation policies than other states. Here is a map of the states in the US that shut down “non-essential businesses.” https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/03/emergencies-closures-states-handling-coronavirus-200317213356419.html

23

Below is a table comparing the corona virus death rate in states with sooner and high social isolation policies (WA, CA, NY & OH) to states with later and fewer isolation policies (TX, FL & AZ).

State

Mand.Clos biz date

CV Dead 3/ 27

CV Dead 4/29

Pop

Millions

Deaths per M 3/27

Dead per M

4/29

CA

3-17

85

1944

40

2

50

NY

3-21

519

23474

20

26

1197

OH

3-22

15

937

12

1

80

WA

3-22

147

801

8

18

110

FL

varies

29

1218

22

1

59

TX

varies

23

749

29

1

27

AZ

varies

8

304

7

1

44

SD

none

2

13

1

2

15

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/

On Thursday, March 19, 2020, California governor Gavin Newsom became the first governor to order his citizens to stay at home, shutting down California’s economy, the world’s eighth-largest. Newsom ordered all of California’s 40 million residents to stay home for two weeks. This was despite the fact that California had one of the lowest corona virus death rates in the nation!

The next day, Friday, March 20, Andrew Cuomo, the governor of New York, became the second governor to join the Hall of Shame – closing the businesses and jobs of 20 million residents of New York. Over the weekend, the governors of Ohio and Washington announced that they too were shutting down their state economies.

At the time, Washington had a relatively high death rate. But over half the deaths occurred in a single nursing home. Ohio’s death rate was even lower than California.

Despite massive pressure, the governors of Texas, Florida, Arizona and South Dakota delayed shutting down all businesses in their states. Texas has 29 million people and Florida has 21 million. South Dakota governor Kristi Noem said, “we’ve been able to keep our businesses open and allow people to take on some personal responsibility.”

Naturally, the media fear peddlers were quick to predict that Texas, Florida, Arizona and South Dakota would quickly be swamped with Corona Virus fatalities. However, as the above chart shows, there has been relatively little increase in the fatality rates of the three states who did the least social isolation. Meanwhile, the states with the most social isolation requirements have seen not only the most fatalities but also the greatest increase in fatalities.

Comparing Fatalities in Nations to Social Isolation Policies
There are a lot of nations in Europe. Only one of them, Italy, has adopted extreme social lock down policies similar to the policies enacted in Washington state and New York. Another nation, Belgium has come close. Most of the nations have taken a more moderate stance – for example, shutting down some schools but not all or shutting down a few businesses but leaving many open. Or allowing mass gatherings as long as the number of people was under 50.

Two nations in Europe, Sweden and Finland, have made compliance voluntary – similar to the voluntary policies of South Korea. Sweden in particular kept schools, bars, restaurants and cinemas open while only restricting gatherings that were over 50 people. The leaders of these “rogue” nations have taken a lot of heat from the Mass Hysteria Media – who remain convinced that anything other than a complete lock down will result in death on a massive scale.

But, as the following table shows, the nations with the least restrictive social isolation policies have the lowest corona virus fatality rates and the nations with the highest social isolation policies also have the highest corona virus fatality rates:

Country

(restrictions)

Deaths per million population 3/29

Deaths per million population 4/29

Italy max

192

458

Spain max

175

519

Belgium high

61

647

Netherlands mod

61

275

France mod

46

369

UK mod

21

384

Sweden low

18

244

Finland low

3

37

Germany mod

8

77

US high

10

186

China

2

3

S Korea low

3

5

World Average

5

29

Here are the sources for this table:

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

https://www.politico.eu/article/how-europe-is-responding-to-the-coronavirus-pandemic/

Here is a chart showing the change in mortality per million population from March 1 to the end of April:

24

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/total-covid-deaths-per-million?tab=chart&year=2020-04-27&country=OWID_WRL+BEL+ESP+ITA+FIN+FRA+JPN+SWE+USA+GBR

There is clearly a huge difference in mortality from country to country – even in neighboring countries. Also, it is clear that from region to region countries with lower social isolation restrictions have lower mortality. But what is really affecting the rate appears to be a combination of population density, air pollution, age of population, diet and smoking rates. Let’s look briefly at some of these factors – none of which have anything to do with social isolation policies.

How can we account for the fact that nations in Europe with the lowest restrictions also have the lowest fatalities?
The truth is that there are many factors that determine the corona virus death rate. All of these factors have nothing to do with social isolation. Here we will look at some factors that influence the variance in fatality rates from country to country.

Age of Population, Air Quality and Fatality Reporting Processes
Italy has a very high fatality rate in part because it has the oldest population in Europe. It also has the worst air quality in Europe. It also is mis-reporting huge numbers of people as corona virus victims when they never were even tested for the corona virus and likely died of something other than the corona virus.

The Hidden Role of Vitamin D
Another reason Italy and Spain are at the top of the list for corona virus fatalities is because they have a very high rate of Vitamin D Deficiency. One of the primary causes of death due to the corona virus (and many other types of flu viruses) is cytokine storms. Vitamin D protects against this problem. However some countries have much high rates of Vitamin D deficiency than other countries. Here is a quote from the study: “A more severe deficiency of Vitamin D is reported in Italy and Spain compared to other countries. “https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.08.20058578v1

We will later review the important role that Vitamin D and Vitamin C play in helping our immune system fight the corona virus. One reason that flu outbreaks typically disappear in the summer is that the sun helps us produce Vitamin D. Fruits also increase in our diet which provides us with more Vitamin C. The virus might still be there in the summer. But our immune system is better able to fight it due to the increases in Vitamin C and Vitamin D.

The Hidden Role of Smoking
One reason Belgium is near the top of the list is because they smoke a huge number of cigarettes each year (2440). Other nations with high smoking rates include Italy (1500), Spain (1500) Switzerland (1500) Netherlands (1460) and France (1100). Meanwhile, Sweden has one of the lowest cigarette consumption rates in the world at 716 per person per year.

Sweden is one quarter the cigarette consumption rate of nearby Belgium. Given how much cigarette smoking damages the lungs – making the lungs more susceptible to a corona virus attack, it should be no surprise that Sweden has a lot fewer corona virus fatalities than Belgium. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_cigarette_consumption_per_capita

Officials in Sweden have said that forcing people to stay inside would be physically and mentally unhealthy. "We have to combine looking at minimizing the health effects of the virus outbreak and the economic impacts of this health crisis," said Stockholm Chamber of Commerce CEO Andreas Hatzigeorgiou. "The business community here really thinks that the Swedish government and the Swedish approach is more sensible than in many other countries."

A study comparing corona fatalities in Sweden to corona fatalities in the UK over time found that Sweden had a much better outcome. https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/comparison-lockdown-uk-non-lockdown-sweden

Here are some quotes from this study:“In terms of reported cases, the data shows no evidence that the UK lock down approach has been any more successful than the Swedish approach. In fact, per million people, Sweden has had fewer cases than the UK. In terms of recorded deaths, again there is no evidence so far that the UK lock down approach has been any more successful than the Swedish approach. In fact, per million people, Sweden has had fewer deaths than the UK (265 versus 419 as of 5/3/20).”

Here is a chart from a study that compared the fatality rates per million in Sweden over the past month to a the fatality rate in a more extremely locked down nation, the UK.

25

“The approach taken in the UK of keeping people in their homes and closing down huge swathes of the economy, has not had any more positive effect on reducing Covid-19 cases or deaths than the Swedish approach. Yet it will put millions out of work, it will destroy thousands of businesses, it will lead to a massive deterioration of mental health, it will lead to an increase in suicides, it will lead to old people dying on their own without their caregivers, and it already has led to an increase of state power on a scale never seen before. “

On April 17, 2020, the person behind the Swedish approach, Dr. Johan Giesecke, stated: “The Sweden approach is based on scientific evidence while the UK policy on lock down is not evidence-based. The correct policy is to protect the old and the frail only. This will eventually lead to herd immunity… The Imperial College paper was “not very good” and he has never seen an unpublished paper have so much policy impact… The flattening of the curve is due to the most vulnerable dying first as much as the lock down… Covid-19 is a “mild disease” and similar to the flu, and it was the novelty of the disease that scared people. The actual fatality rate of Covid-19 is the region of 0.1%. At least 50% of the population of both the UK and Sweden will be shown to have already had the disease when mass antibody testing becomes available. https://unherd.com/thepost/coming-up-epidemiologist-prof-johan-giesecke-shares-lessons-from-sweden/

I am extremely gratified that Sweden decided to adopt an evidence based approach – which will give all of us something to compare the rest of the world to. I also agree with Dr. Giesecke that it is just a matter of time until more test results are available – and when they come out in the next few weeks, it will expose the lock down approach to be a disastrous waste of time.

Comparing Nicaragua with other Central American Nations
Nicaragua, like Sweden has thus far resisted demands to shut down their economy. With 6.5 million inhabitants, Nicaragua had as of April 22nd only 2 deaths - the lowest in the entire region. It is followed by Guatemala, with 10 deaths; El Salvador, with 8 deaths; Honduras, with 35 deaths; Costa Rica, with 4 deaths; and Panama, with 103 deaths. In the two countries with the most draconian confinement measures (El Salvador and Honduras), deaths per million are much higher than in Nicaragua.

Country

Pop M

Deaths as of 4/29

Deaths per M

4/29

Nicaragua

6.5

3

0.5

Guatemala

6

16

2

El Salvador

6

8

1

Honduras

6

71

7

Costa Rica

4

6

1

Panama

5

178

41

Nicaragua has not established, nor will it establish, any kind of quarantine. The reason given is that Nicaragua is a poor country that cannot afford to close its economy. Most families live from self-employment and depend on their daily income. “We should not lose our heads and “shut down” the country, that we should continue working but take the precautionary measures.” https://www.globalresearch.ca/nicaragua-covid-19-western-media-best-kept-secret/5708915

How can we account for the fact that nations in Central America with the lowest restrictions also have the lowest fatalities? Nicaragua is an example of a country using healthy living practices to cut down disease transmission. This is a win-win solution where the people stay healthy and the economy stays open. So there you have it. States with lower restrictions have fewer fatalities. Nations in Europe with lower restrictions have fewer fatalities. Also nations in Central America with lower restrictions have fewer fatalities.

What’s Next?
Hopefully, the above examples have at least convinced you that we should take a deeper look at the interactions between social isolation and flu epidemics. In the next section, we will look at evidence that extreme social isolation policies might actually make flu epidemics worse – killing more people than it saves.

3.1 A Social Isolation Timeline

“Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”

George Santayana

 

In this section, we will provide a rough historical timeline of when and how various social isolation policies were adopted here in Washington state, in the US and around the world.

2020 Flu Season Timeline
The most accurate estimate of flu prevalence in the US is a CDC table that provides a weekly summary of all hospital admissions in the US and a summary of all flu admissions. Here is a link to this table: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/weeklyarchives2019-2020/data/senAllregt16.html

01

The table rows are weeks of the year. For example, the row “202011” means the 11th week of 2020 which ended on Saturday April 14, 2020. The most important column is the seventh column labeled Total ILI (ILI stands for Influenza Like Illness).

This column (in the complete table on the website) shows there were 3 flu strains during the 2020 flu season. Flu Type B hit a peak at the end of December of 95,632 admissions (which was 7.1% of all admissions that week). Flu Type A hit a peak of 110, 729 at the end of Week 6 (which was also 7.1% of all admissions that week) on February 8, 2020. The peak of total hospitalizations for all reasons occurred at the end of Week 5 which was February 1.

Corona virus admissions, (which I will call Flu Type C) hit a peak of 88,696 at the end of Week 11 which was March 14, 2020. This was 6.3 percent of all admissions that week. After March 14, 2020, total hospital admissions for the corona virus fell to 78,095 for week 12 ending March 21st.

Because it takes 10 days for flu illness to become so severe that an infected person will go to the hospital, we know that the date of peak infections for the corona virus in the US was March 4, 2020 – 15 days before March 19, 2020 when the first Stay Home order was issued in the US. By then, hospital admissions were down to 78.095 and serious cases were less than 60,000.

02

Therefore, social isolation orders had no effect on reducing corona virus infections or fatalities because our immune system had already stopped the corona virus two weeks before social isolation measures were put in place.

Here is a graph of total hospital admissions for all reasons (red line) and flu hospital admissions (blue line) in the US:

03rr

You can see that flu admissions admissions never overwhelmed US hospitals. In fact, flu admissions peaked at 7 percent of hospital admissions on February 1, 2020.

March 4, 2020 Corona Virus Flu Infections peaked
We know corona virus infections peaked on March 4 because, Corona virus hospital admissions peaked on March 14, 2020. It takes an average of 10 days for flu infection symptoms to become serious enough for people to go to the hospital.

Here is a graph showing only US flu admissions in 2020.

04

The graph uses data from US hospital weekly admissions as reported to the CDC. It shows that weekly corona virus hospital admissions peaked on March 14, 2020. Because it takes an average of 10 days for flu infections to become serious enough for people to go to the hospital, we know that corona virus infections peaked on March 4, 2020. Thanks to our immune system, corona virus infections fell dramatically well before the first Stay Home order was issued on March 19, 2020. This is why we can say for certain that Stay Home orders did not reduce corona virus infections, admissions or fatalities. All these idiotic draconian Stay Home orders did was cause more than 60 million people to lose their jobs – and about 600,000 additional people to die from suicide and drug abuse as a direct consequence of reckless government officials crashing our economy.

But Wait – What about the 30,000 new confirmed cases being reported daily by the CDC?

05

The graph above shows new cases peaked at 30,000 per day on April 1, 2020 and have remained near 30,000 new cases every day ever since. But new cases are NOT related to hospital admissions. They are simply related to the number of people tested as well as the spread of the virus in the community. The more people you test and the more the virus spreads, the more new cases there will be.

March 14, 2020 US Corona Virus Hospital Admissions Peaked

What about the ongoing corona virus fatalities being reported daily by the CDC? It takes about 30 days for the most serious cases to end in death. New admissions fell to almost nothing by May 1. Therefore, corona virus fatalities will fall to almost nothing by June 1.

If corona virus hospital admissions had already declined 40% by the time California Governor Gavin Newsom issued the first Stay Home order on March 19, 2020, then why did he issue it?
This appears to be part of a multi-billion dollar plan funded by Bill Gates. Perhaps Newsom believed the lies he was being told.

A Social Isolation Timeline
My personal social isolation nightmare began during the third week in March 2020. Several related adverse events occurred that led me to conclude that I needed to publish my research on the Corona virus and why social distancing would not reduce either cases or fatalities:

#1 On Monday, March 16, the Stock Market had a record decline of 13%. In the past 30 days, the stock market has declined from about 30,000 to about 20,000 – a loss of 33%. People who own stock lost trillions of dollars due to false claims about the corona virus.

#2 On Friday, March 20, the Governor of Washington state announced that not only all schools and colleges are closed but also all restaurants, bars, and gyms. Gatherings of more than 50 people are also prohibited as are most gatherings of less than 50 people. Thus, all sporting events have been canceled. Even the local library is now closed.

#3 My daughter came home in tears explaining that her church trip had been canceled – and three of her friends had been fired from their jobs due to their small businesses closing as a result of the governor of Washington shutting down most businesses in our state.

#4 A friend of mine was forced to fire half of her staff as her local small business was shut down as being “non-essential.”

#5 My classes at the Lighthouse Mission teaching homeless people how to start their own business was also shut down as were my classes at two local elementary schools. Shutting down these classes is not only a tragedy for me. It is a tragedy for all of my students – because we were making a real difference in their lives.

#6 Estimates are that more than 1.2 million people will lose their jobs here in Washington state and more than 60 million people nationally. As I noted previously, this is likely to increase fatalities due to heart attacks, strokes and suicides by 600,000 needless deaths as a result of government officials recklessly shutting down nearly all businesses.

#7 The US Federal Reserve and Congress announced trillions of dollars in bailouts to try to keep major corporations afloat. This huge cost will eventually be paid by US tax payers. Assuming the bailout reaches $10 trillion, each American will be $30,000 more in debt. This is a cost of $10,000 per month for each month of our 3 month forced vacations.

#8 Numerous cities have closed their local parks – denying children a place to get exercise. This is on top of the malls closing and the local gyms all closing. Apparently the government wants every one to stay inside on their couches watching the Mass Hysteria media talk about the dangers of the corona virus all day long.

#9 On Thursday March 19, 2020, the Governors of California issued a statewide “stay at home” order – despite the fact that corona virus infections had already been falling for more than 2 weeks. The Governor of California also closed all playgrounds in California and stated that he believed that 300,000 people will die in California from the Corona virus in the next 8 weeks. We have shown that this can not possibly be true. But it will certainly scare people in California which is the real goal. As of April 30, 2020, California had 1,954 deaths – and might not go over 3,000. Thus, the governor of California over-estimated corona virus fatalities by a factor of 100! Here is the Governor of California surrounded by the police and national guard.

06

Note they are not 6 feet apart – and they are not wearing facemasks.

#10 On Friday, March 20, 2020, the governors of New York and Illinois issued Stay Home orders in their states.

#11 Also, on Friday March 20, 2020, Washington Governor, Jay Inslee held a press conference in which he asked all state residents to voluntarily hide in their houses.
Here are some shocking quotes from the Inslee Press conference: “Stay home unless it is necessary for you to go out. Older people should not go out any more unless it is essential. It is too dangerous for your grand kids and your family to be close to you. If you are a young person and you go out to a restaurant, the penalty is you might kill your grandparent. It is a moral crime to put other people at risk.

This is how low things have sunk here in Washington state. Kids are no longer allowed to hug their grandparents without the fear of killing them and anyone who leaves their house for anything other than an emergency is putting the lives of other people at risk. Pure insanity has taken over. None of these statements is supported by even the slightest scientific research.

#12 On March 23, 2020 Inslee held another press conference in which he stated that not enough people were complying with his “voluntary order” to stay home. He therefore was forced to make the order mandatory. This new order included mandatory closure of all “non-essential” businesses and all public parks.

07

What is most disgusting about the closure of public parks is that going outside and playing at the park is one of the best ways to improve a child’s immune system. The other disgusting thing is that children under the age of 18 have been shown to have almost no chance of getting the corona virus. Despite these two facts, all parks and playground in Washington state were closed by Jay Inslee on March 23, 2020.

#13 On March 30, 2020, Inslee held another press conference at which he announced that the state has set up a website where people can report neighbors and local businesses that were not complying with his orders to stay inside.

08

#14 On Thursday April 2, 2020, Inslee held another press conference. This time he announced that he was extending the shutdown of all schools and nearly all businesses in Washington state to at least May 4th. People are supposed to stay inside their homes unless they need to go get some food. As we cover later in this book, his order was a gross violation of the US Constitution and the Washington State Constitution.

#15 On Monday, April 6, 2020, Washington state Superintendent of Public Instruction Chris Reykdal held a Press conference with Governor Inslee and announced that all public schools in the state would not reopen this year. Reykdal said that a challenge to moving all classes online was that many students did not have internet access. He then said that internet access should be a basic human right just like having safe drinking water. The irony of this statement is that half of the public schools in Washington state do not have a safe source of drinking water. So much for Reykdal being concerned about basic human rights like drinking water. For graduating seniors, Reykdal says not to worry. He will waive credits for students who need it. Because schools will remain closed for the rest of this school year, Reykdal says students would lose about 320 learning hours – or 2.4 percent of a student’s entire education. What he failed to note was that 320 hours is 30% of the current school years learning time.

#16 On Tuesday April 7, 2020, Washington Governor Jay Inslee announced his veto of $445 million in state funding to “prepare for the loss in revenue brought about by the pandemic.” But it was not the pandemic that caused the loss in revenue – it was Inslee closing nearly all of the businesses in Washington state. Among the cuts was $100 million that would have added urgently needed counselors to our public schools. I guess if we are not going to have real schools, there is no need to have real counselors.

Also on April 7, 2020, the Washington State Transportation Department announced a 45 percent decline in State gas tax revenue. This will mean that 45 percent of transportation projects will need to be cut and 45 percent of transportation construction workers will lose their jobs in the coming months. This is at a time when our bridges and roads already have a $20 billion backlog of urgently needed projects.

#17 April 10, 2020. Church goers were fined $500 for attending service.
On the week before Easter Sunday, churches in Kentucky and Greenville, Mississippi attempted to hold church services where worshipers would remain in the safety of their cars in the parking lot while the minister broadcast the service over a loudspeaker system or on a local radio channel. In both cases, police raided the church services and gave tickets to the worshipers of $500 each. Charles Hamilton, pastor of King James Bible Baptist Church stated:
"The police in Greenville, MS went to Temple Baptist Church this evening and gave everyone there a ticket for $500 because they had a drive in service.

Everyone was in their cars with the windows up listening to pastor Arthur Scott preached on the radio. What is harmful about people being in their cars listening to preaching with their windows up? Christians do you all see what is going on?"

09

"I told them to get some more tickets ready because we will be preaching Sunday morning and Sunday night. The police officer said I might go to jail. If it means going to jail and if it takes that for me to keep preaching, I’ll be glad to go to jail."

#18 On Saturday, April 11, 2020, a Kentucky judge, Justin Walker, ruled that it was contrary to the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution to shut down drive in church services. The judge noted that the government allowed drive through restaurants and even drive through liquor stores to remain open. So church services would be allowed to continue. Here is a quote from his ruling:

“On Holy Thursday, an American mayor criminalized the communal celebration of Easter. That sentence is one that this Court never expected to see outside the pages of a dystopian novel, or perhaps the pages of The Onion. The Mayor’s decision is stunning. And it is beyond all reason,’ unconstitutional.”

https://apnews.com/28cb3aeb9345392f336b77e4b3da5bf3

#19 Also on April 11, 2020, a study was published by Stanford University which concluded that the corona virus was 50 to 84 times more prevalent than previously thought. This also meant the mortality rate from the corona virus was 50 to 84 times LESS than previously thought. Here is a link to this study: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.14.20062463v1.full.pdf

This may be one of the most important scientific studies ever published as it confirmed that the corona virus was not much more lethal than the seasonal flu. This study measured antibody presence in 3,330 people from Santa Clara CA and found huge numbers of people had the corona virus with no apparent symptoms – and thus were spreading the virus throughout the community. This study was supported a week later by similar studies from the State of New York and LA – both of which also concluded that the prevalence of the corona virus was about 50 times greater than previously thought.

This study makes it clear that the human immune system can destroy the virus in well over 99% of all cases. It also means that plans to contain the virus through social isolation are doomed to fail.

Critics of the study claimed that it was not yet peer reviewed. What these critics failed to point out was that the Ferguson study which claimed that 2.2 million people would be killed in the US and which formed the basis of government policy to shutdown the economy was also never peer reviewed. In fact, almost none of the corona virus studies published thus far have been peer reviewed.

A second complaint was that the sample was not a random sample. What this complaint overlooks is that the authors of all three studies showed that the demographics of the sample matched the demographics of the community represented by the sample. In addition, both confirming studies were random samples and got the same result. But most important, the Ferguson study used to shut down the economy did not use any sample at all. One has to wonder why critics are suddenly concerned about sample bias when they had no concern at all about the Ferguson study.

A third, more valid criticism is that the corona virus antibody test used in the study has high false positive and false negative error rates. Similar unreliable antibody tests were used in the New York and LA studies. This does not change the result of the study – but it could reduce our confidence in the accuracy of the study - if it were only one study that found actual cases were 50 times previously confirmed cases. However, when you get three different major studies from 3 different parts of the US – all of which found the same result – then we can conclude that the inaccuracies of the anti-body test method in terms of false positives and false negatives tend to balance out.

More to the point, those who now criticize the antibody test as being inaccurate fail to admit that the test they have been using to “confirm” corona virus infections – the PCR test – may be even LESS accurate than the antibody test.

A final criticism of the Santa Clara antibody study was that “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” This claim is turning the scientific method upside down. It is not an extraordinary claim for a study to provide evidence that the corona virus is similar to all other flu viruses in terms of prevalence, transmission and mortality. Indeed, the null hypothesis is that any flu virus or cold virus is like any other flu or cold virus until proof is provided that the new virus is different from the existing viruses. Up until now, no such proof has been made.

Claiming that the corona virus is a lethal weapon 50 times worse than the seasonal flu is the Extraordinary Claim. This claim does indeed require exceptional evidence before government officials can justify shutting down the economy for months on end, destroying millions of small businesses and putting 60 million people out of work. Yet all that was used to justify this claim was the discredited Ferguson study – which was paid for by more than 100 million dollars from Bill Gates.

Thanks to the Santa Clara, LA and New York studies, we can rest assured that the null hypotheses, that the corona virus is about the same as the seasonal flu, has been upheld. But the truth is that no evidence is needed under the scientific method to uphold the null hypotheses. I am certain that dozens of additional studies will be released in the next month and I am equally certain that they too will confirm the null hypotheses. The truth is a powerful weapon. No amount of money by any billionaires and no degree of corruption by any government officials can keep the truth hidden forever.

#20 On Monday, April 13, it was announced that Washington hit the peak in daily Corona Virus fatalities perhaps on Saturday April 11. The rest of the nation is still a few days away.

#21 Also on Monday, April 13, 2020, a study was released confirming that the corona virus was destroyed by sunlight.
The National Bioforensic Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC) - which is part of the Science and Technology Division of the US Department of Homeland Security - released a study on April 13, 2020, called Research, Development , Testing and Evaluation Efforts re Covid-19. This study found that Covid-19 was destroyed when exposed to direct sunlight. Here is a graph of how long the virus persists on a stainless steel surface when not in sunlight:

10

With no sunlight, at a normal temperature, and low humidity, such as might occur in the evening in the middle of winter, the virus can survive for up to 18 hours. However, with sunlight, even in winter the survival time drops down to less than 8 minutes. In the summer, when exposed to direct sunlight, the virus survival time drops down to less than 3 minutes. Here is a link to this study: https://www.scribd.com/document/456897616/DHSST#download&from_embed

11

This is one reason the corona virus will be less prevalent in the summer than in the winter. But the most important reason corona infections will fall dramatically during the summer is that the human immune system is much stronger in the summer than in the winter.

#22 On Tuesday April 14, a downward trend was established in New York confirming a peak is close.
On April 4, 2020, total New York Hospitalizations began to decline. The number fell from over 1000 to 574. Since then, the number of new hospitalized in New York has fallen rapidly. The number of discharges have also increased rapidly with daily discharges now over 1,700 while new admissions are only 200. This means that the corona virus death count in New York should begin to decline by April 15, 2020. It also means that New York City hospitals should no longer be at capacity within a few days. This also means that nationally, the number of daily fatalities should begin to drop by April 29, 2020. Below is a graph of total hospitalizations in New York as of April 23, 2020:

12

#23 Also on April 14, 2020, Washington state Governor Jay Inslee gave an interview on a local radio show in which he made some extremely disturbing statements indicating he was completely aware of the spread of the virus or the inaccurate nature of tests for the virus. https://omny.fm/shows/kiro-nights/governor-jay-inslee-joins-kiro-nights

Here are a couple of his statements followed by my comments.

Inslee: We want a transition to a smart approach, which is individualized, which can protect individuals. And when they get a fever, make sure they're tested immediately and making sure we have contact tracing for everyone they've had contact in, sort of like a fire brigade. We want to have fire brigades when your house is on fire, you call and you get, you know, service in minutes. We need to do the same thing for individuals.

My comments: Inslee seems to be completely unaware that 95% or more of all Corona virus cases do not have any symptoms. There is no fever to alert us that a person has the corona virus. This makes the corona virus much different from a house fire. We know for sure when a house is on fire because smoke is always present. So his plan to treat the corona virus like a house fire is doomed to failure.

The second problem with his shocking statement is that he seems to be completely unaware of how inaccurate corona virus tests are. There are huge numbers of false positives and huge numbers of false negatives. Inslee placing his faith in virus testing is like placing his faith in fire trucks that go to the wrong house half the time and even when they do go to the right house, water never comes out of the fire hose. Whoever is advising Inslee is giving him very bad advice.

Inslee: “We need to have that testing and contact tracing capability so that the curve of fatalities would not come back up again.”

My comments: Again Inslee is showing a complete lack of awareness of how inaccurate the tests are. Inslee then refers to swabs and the UW testing lab. These comments make it clear that his plan is to do mass PCR testing (something I do not think has ever been done before). This means that the tests will not only be extremely inaccurate, they will also be extremely expensive.

For more on the cost and drawbacks of PCR tests, see Chapter 5, Sections 5.1 and 5.2. Inslee also seems to be completely unaware of the fact that what is going to cause the curve of fatalities to go back up again is his own mandatory extreme isolation policies which are preventing the population from gaining herd immunity to the virus in a safe way and at a time (spring and summer) when our immune system is strong rather than at a point (fall and winter) when our immune system is weak.

Inslee: “I think the virus is going to be with us for years, or less depending on when we really get a vaccine or a palliative medical procedure, there are several trials being held today, some and in Washington State to try to get a treatment for the disease even before a vaccine. “

My comments: Inslee seems to be completely unaware that there has never been an effective long term vaccine or magic bullet drug treatment for any flu virus – due to the extremely rapid mutation of viruses. It’s like he skipped the class on viruses in health class when he went to public schools.

Inslee: We sort of been plateaued for a period of time and we need to get down to zero or close to zero. And at that point we bring in this fire brigade approached to prevent new infections from starting up. That's a place where we can then begin to reopen our businesses and get back to our social lives that are more acceptable.

My comments: This is perhaps his most shocking comment. I am certain that at some point this summer the number of corona virus cases will drop to near zero. But it will not be due to social distancing. It will be due to stronger immune systems in the summer. But conditioning the re-opening of businesses on zero or close to zero cases means that it is going to be a long time before businesses re-open – and also presents the danger that when the second wave hits in October 2020, Inslee will just shut all businesses back down again.

Inslee (in response to a question of whether the PCR test or the antibody test is more useful to help get people back to work with some sort of test ID card): I think they're both important. I don't know how to choose between them. They work in concert, obviously the RNA test is good, but it doesn't tell you whether you actually have the disease now or not, and we don't know yet whether even having the antibodies makes you a non transmitter.

My comments: Once again, Inslee is not aware that both the PCR test and the antibody test (which he mistakenly calls the RNA test) are extremely inaccurate. As for whether a person can transmit the virus even when they have antibodies, the answer is yes they can. This is why we need to focus in on improving the immune system rather than trying to avoid the virus. For more on asymptomatic transmission, see this April 4, 2020 article: https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-carriers-transmit-without-symptoms-what-to-know-2020-4

In a study on the antibody question published on March 4, 2020, even though many patients were extremely ill, it took up to one month for antibodies to appear. The median time was 12 days. In the first 7 days, the RNA test (PCR test) was accurate 67% of the time while the antibody test was accurate 38% of the time. The antibody test became much more accurate over time while the RNA test did not. Here are a couple of quote from the study: “The real-world performance of PCR based RNA testing is unsatisfied. Many suspected patients had to be tested for several days with multiple samples before confirm diagnosis were made.” (in other words, PCR tests have many false negatives).

“ For healthy close contact who is in the quarantine period, he/she should be deemed as a probable carriers if antibody positive.” https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.02.20030189v1.full.pdf

I should add that the reverse is also true. People can be antibody positive even though they have never had the corona virus. This is because the antibody test has a huge number of false positives in that it is actually picking up antibodies for the human cold which is closely related to the corona virus.

Because antibody tests have all kinds of problems, on April 8 2020, the World Health Organization published a statement warning against the use of antibody tests in making critical decisions. Here a quote:
"Inadequate (antigen) tests may miss patients with active infection or falsely categorize patients as having the disease when they do not. At present, based on current evidence, WHO recommends the use of these new tests only in research settings. They should not be used in any other setting, including for clinical decision-making, until evidence supporting use for specific indications is available.”

Here is another quote: “the sensitivity of these tests varies from 34% to 80%. Based on this information, half or more of COVID-19 infected patients might be missed by such tests, depending on the group of patients tested. These assumptions urgently require further study to understand whether they are accurate. Additionally, false-positive results – that is, a test showing that a person is infected when they are not – could occur if the antibodies on the test strip also recognize antigens of viruses other than COVID-19, such as from human corona viruses that cause the common cold… Antibody detection tests targeting COVID-19 may also cross-react with other pathogens, including other human corona viruses (aka the common cold) and give false-positive results.”

https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/advice-on-the-use-of-point-of-care-immunodiagnostic-tests-for-covid-19

Here is a quote from a recent NPR article on the problem of antibody test false positives: “Because of these significant limitations, antibody tests fall short of being the imagined passport that would allow people to get back to business as usual and ignore the corona virus.”
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/04/15/834497497/antibody-tests-for-coronavirus-can-miss-the-mark

If a reporter from NPR can figure this out, why can’t Inslee?

#24 On April 15, 2020, the US Commerce Department announced record declines in retail sales.
Auto sales dropped 25%. Clothing store sales dropped 50%. Restaurant revenue dropped 27%. The report doesn’t include spending on services such as hotel stays, airline tickets, or movie theaters, all of them suffering severe declines due to locking down the entire US economy. Economists at JP Morgan Chase now forecast the US economy will shrink by a record-shattering 40% in the April-June quarter. Discretionary spending by shoppers is expected to collapse 40%-50% in the first-half 2020, according to Fitch Ratings. More than 250,000 stores, including Macy’s, Nordstrom and Nike, which sell non-essential merchandise have been shuttered since mid-March. That’s 60% of overall US retail square footage, according to Neil Saunders, managing director of Global Retail Research https://www.kxnet.com/news/national-news/us-retail-sales-plunge-a-historic-8-7-in-march-a-drop-not-seen-in-a-century/

 

#25 Also on April 15, 2020, protesters surrounded the Michigan State Capital
Supporters of the Michigan Conservative Coalition requested that Governor Gretchen Whitmer reopen the economy on May 1 and ease restrictions to return life to normal. They circulated a petition to have her recalled — one that generated more than 200,000 signatures — while more than 300,000 Facebook users joined a group titled "Michiganders Against Excessive Quarantine".

Matthew Seely, a spokesman for the Michigan Conservative Coalition, said the event is intended to be "nonpartisan."

"We are asking people to become united on this one issue — all Michiganders to say we've gone too far," he said. "We're responsible adults and can be trusted to go out in public."

Thousands of cars blocked off access to the capital for several miles. Here is an image of the protesters on the steps of the state capital.

13

#26 Also on April 15, 2020, the Pennsylvania State Senate voted to end the state lock down. Senate Bill 613 requires Governor Wolf to align state policy with federal guidelines in reopening businesses. This would mean that businesses in Pennsylvania could reopen as soon as May 1, 2020. It is unknown if the governor will veto the bill.

#27 On April 16, another 6 million jobs were lost for a total of 23 million jobs lost in the past three weeks. At the same time, we learned that the bailout bill gave 24 billion to billionaire Jeff Bezos during the same time that 23 million Americans lost their jobs. https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/bailouts-secured-bezos-wealth-soars-24-billion-17-million-americans-lose-their

#28 Also this week, the Clark County Council drafted a letter to the Governor of Washington asking him to amend his isolation policy to allow construction workers to go back to work.

#29 Also this week, the City of Lynden Washington decided to defy the Governors Construction ban by letting construction workers know they can go back to work in the city of Lynden. Good for you Lynden. Be Brave!

#30 On April 17, 2020, the federal government announced a 3 Step plan for re-opening the economy. The problem with the plan is that for any state to re-open would require that state to have a downward trend in corona virus new cases for at least 14 days. Currently, not a single state has such a downward trend. States will also need to have widespread availability of tests – which not a single state has – and the ability to track and isolate all cases – which none of them have. What is not mentioned is that none of the current tests are accurate. In short, the federal plan is doomed to fail.

#31 On April 19, 2020, there was an huge rally/protest in Olympia, the State Capital, of people wanting the Governor to let people go back to work. There is also an online petition with 21,000 signatures asking Inslee to allow construction workers to go back to work. Here is a picture of the protest:

14

#32 Also on April 20, 2020, the price of oil dropped to negative for the first time in history – indicating that the world economy is the worst in history.

#33 Also on April 20, 2020, Facebook banned all posts and page organizing anti-lock down protests. "Events that defy government's guidance on social distancing aren’t allowed on Facebook," said Facebook spokesman Andy Stone.” This is why, near the end of this book, I have included a section on how groups can create social organization tools that they control rather than using organization tools controlled by billionaires.

#34 Also on April 20, 2020, Georgia Governor Brian Kemp announced that he would lift the business shutdown in Georgia in the next five days – despite the fact that Georgia did not meet any of the federal requirements to re-open.

#35 On April 21, 2020, the Washington State Department of Health published a study summarizing all corona virus admissions in Washington state. This study confirmed that – even at the height of the epidemic, corona virus patients only took 7% of the available hospital beds in Washington state. They currently occupy less than 1 % of the beds – meaning that the claim that hospitals in Washington state would be overwhelmed was a complete farce. Still on the same day, Inslee said that his economic suicide order must continue.

#36 Also on April 21, 2020, a mother was arrested for taking her two kids to a public playground. So we have people being arrested for attending church and taking their kids to the park at the same time that convicted felons are being let out of prison. This is why I content that government officials have gone completely crazy. Here is a link to the YouTube video of the arrest. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hq9Gv7Uolsg&feature=emb_logo

#37 On April 22, 2020, computer modelers from the University of Washington (funded by Bill Gates) announced that Washington would not be able to re-open until the end of May. http://www.healthdata.org/covid/updates

Here is a shocking quote from their latest report:

“When all occurring infections in a location, not just new ones – fall below 1 infection per 1,000,000 population... locations could potentially identify via active case detection and contact tracing.”

They then presented this map of when they felt States would meet this standard:

15

I can not imagine cases ever falling this low. But time will tell.

#38 Also on April 22, 2020, the 500 Bed US Navy hospital left NYC after treating just 179 patients in three weeks.

#39 Also on April 22, 2020 Inslee sent letter to Franklin County that re-opening would be a violation of state law. Inslee stated that the Commissioners were in direct violation his "Stay Home" order. His letter stated, "The action taken by the Board of Commissioners intentionally and knowingly violates an order issued by the Governor pursuant to his emergency powers, see RCW 43.06.220(1), and it therefore violates state law.”

In fact, it is Governor Inslee who is breaking the law because RCW 43.06.220 – along with all other laws by the legislature can not over-ride either the US Constitution or the Washington State Constitution.

#40 On April 23, 2020, NY Governor Cuomo stated that an estimated 14% of all the people in New York likely have the corona virus according to a random antibody test of 3000 people in 19 counties in New York. This should be the final nail in the coffin for Inslee’s plan to get new infections all the way down to zero and monitoring everyone with the virus. Here is a link to the article: https://www.newsday.com/news/health/coronavirus/coronavirus-long-island-new-york-1.44047680

#41 Also on Thursday April 23, the Washington State Employment Security Department admitted that while the official unemployment was 605,514, actual claims could be as high as one million by April 26 – three times higher than the peak of the Great Recession. https://esd.wa.gov/unemployment/help

#42 Also on April 23, 2020, the Walla Walla County sheriff became the third elected sheriff in Washington state to defy the Governors shutdown order. https://komonews.com/news/local/walla-walla-co-sheriff-aims-to-reopen-economy-amid-pandemic

#43 On April 24, 2020, Washington state governor Inslee announced that certain low-risk construction projects - that had already been underway - could restart as long as they can comply with a very strict Corona Virus Safety Plan - which includes requirements for corona training, physical distancing, Personal Protection Equipment, and monitoring employees for symptoms. The announcement does not allow any new construction activity. The problem with the announcement, besides the impracticality of PPE on a construction site is that Washington was one of only 10 states to not declare construction as an essential activity in the first place. All of the states around Washington, including Oregon, Idaho and California have allowed the vast majority of construction projects to continue. Here is a link that shows which states have shut down the majority of construction projects. https://www.urban.org/urban-wire/essential-construction-work-during-pandemic-needs-prioritize-worker-safety

16

#44 On April 25, 2020, 4 state prison systems, Arkansas, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia released several studies – all of which confirmed that the ratio of asymptomatic corona virus carriers to carriers with symptoms was about 50 to 1. Marion Correctional Institution houses 2,500 prisoners in north central Ohio. Many of them are older with pre-existing health conditions. 2,300 inmates were tested for the corona virus. Of the 2,028 who tested positive, 95% had no symptoms. The Bledsoe County Correctional Complex in Pikeville, Tennessee tested 3,503 prisoners. 651 were positive, and most of them were asymptomatic. Neuse Correctional Institution in Goldsboro, North Carolina tested all 723 prisoners. Of the 444 who were infected by the virus, 98% were asymptomatic. Dr. Leana Wen, adjunct associate professor of emergency medicine at George Washington University, stated:

“It adds to the understanding that we have a severe under count of cases in the US. The corona virus case count is likely much, much higher than we currently know.”

Here is a link to an article about these studies: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-prisons-testing-in/in-four-u-s-state-prisons-nearly-3300-inmates-test-positive-for-coronavirus-96-without-symptoms-idUSKCN2270RX

This adds to the Santa Clara study, the LA study and the New York study all of which support my contention that the corona virus is 50 times more prevalent than currently thought – and therefore 50 times less lethal than currently thought – the same as the seasonal flu.

#45 April 27, 2020 A Facebook group called Reopen Washington has 22,000 members in their first two weeks.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/541022106840124/

#46 Also on April 27, 2020 Governor Inslee held a press conference announcing that come May 5th, we can play golf as long as we only play with one other family member. He also admitted that the state will face a budget shortfall of “billions of dollars.” But he hopes the federal government will bail out the state.

#47 On April 28, 2020, Judge Micheal McHaney, in Illinois issued an injunction against the governor’s Stay Home order. The judge ruled in favor of State Representative Darren Bailey who filed a lawsuit against the governor claiming he would be irreparably harmed if he was forced to comply with the order and that the order violated his civil rights. The judge told the attorney for the governor:

“Are you seriously trying to argue that this executive order has not caused serious injury? The Illinois Constitution is being violated and the Bill of Rights is being shredded. That’s irreparable harm. Individual rights do not disappear during a public health crisis.” Judge Micheal McHaney

#48 Also on April 28, 2020, the New York Times published an article claiming that Corona virus fatalities in the US may be unreported by 50%. To get this result, they carefully cherry picked data from only 7 states. They then carefully selected a five week period that ended April 11 – even though actual data at the time the article was published through April 25. I double checked the data they used and it appeared to be correct. The state of New Jersey was a major outlier – supposedly responsible for most of the under reporting with the claim that it had under reported corona virus fatalities by 3000 deaths in the previous 3 weeks. In fact, through April 11, 2020 corona virus fatalities - as reported by doctors - were only half the excess fatalities in New Jersey. Then the CDC changed the death certificate rules requiring that doctors report all fatalities as corona virus fatalities. Here is what happened the very next week as a result of the rule change: For the week of April 12 through April 18, in New Jersey there were 1421 excess deaths and 1265 reported corona deaths. Therefore in the space of one week, thanks to the rule change, corona deaths went from about half of excess deaths to 89% of excess deaths. So what really happened is not that corona deaths were under reported in the previous weeks. Rather they have been over-reported since the CDC changed the rules. Clearly, the New York Times is not even remotely interested in informing their readers. They appear to only be interested in scaring the hell out of readers in order to sell more papers.

#49 April 30, 2020 Inslee Illegal $11 Billion Budget Blunder Exposed
Imagine you are running a state that is more dependent than any other state in the nation on sales tax from economic activity for revenue. Imagine the annual state budget is $24 billion. Now imagine you decide to shutdown the state economy for 3 months (one quarter of the year) because you were suckered into believing a couple of scam studies funded by the world’s richest billionaire. How much do you think the budget shortfall would be for your reckless decision? Here is a clue. $6 billion is one quarter of $24 billion.

It should therefore not come as a surprise to learn that the budget shortfall in Washington state as a direct result of Governor Inslee shutting down our economy for March, April and May will come to at least $6 billion. Here is a quote from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities – which issued a report on April 23, 2020 analyzing the budget shortfalls in all 50 states as a result of business closures:

The Center estimates that state budget shortfalls will ultimately reach about 10 percent in the current fiscal year (which ends on June 30 in most states) and as much as 25 percent in fiscal year 2021 based on recent economic projections.”

https://www.cbpp.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/4-2-20sfp.pdf

Washington state will get $2 billion in federal aid from the recent corporate bailout bill. This will be almost enough to offset the $2.4 billion budget shortfall for the current fiscal year which ends of June 30th. But it will be up to the state legislature to figure out how to cut a record $6 billion (25%) from the budget for the new fiscal year which begins on July 1, 2020. They will also need to cut the budget for the following year by $2.5 billion.

Even if the legislature cut 20% of the public school teachers, it would only save $3 billion. Cutting 20% from school district budgets means that every class will increase in size from the current 30 students per class (among the highest in the nation) to 36 students per class. 12,000 teachers will lose their jobs along with another 12,000 in administration and support staff.

Cutting 100% of state support for every college and university would save another billion dollars but cost the jobs of thousands of college faculty as well as lead to a possible doubling of tuition at every college and university in Washington state.

That still leaves $2 billion in cuts or more than 20% in cuts from every state agency. That is another 24,000 state public service jobs lost. Total public jobs lost will be as high as 30,000. This does not include the public service jobs lost in cities and counties. They also depend on revenue from sales tax. That is another 30,000 jobs lost.

Then there are the public construction jobs lost due to the 45% decline in the state gas tax. That is another 40,000 jobs. The horrifying total could be as high as 100,000 public sector jobs in Washington state. Every state, county, city, college and school district employee who is about to lose their job because our economy was shut down for three months needs to realize why they were fired. They will not lose their jobs because of a virus that is not much worse than the seasonal flu. They will be losing their jobs because Jay Inslee was fooled into believing some fake science reports paid for by Bill Gates.

How long will social distancing laws be enforced?
The answer to this question varies from state to state. Six states never closed. 15 more states will open by the end of April. 15 more states will open in early May and 10 more will open later in May or early June. Only 6 states have provided no specific end date. Sadly, Washington is one of these 6 states. Here is a table of the timeline:

Date Open

State Policies as of April 24 2020

Businesses Closed one month or less:

already open

States with no orders continue Arkansas, South Dakota, Nebraska, North Dakota, Utah, Wyoming

April 24 open

Alaska, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, Texas (partial), Oklahoma,

April 27 open

Colorado, Mississippi, Montana, Tennessee,

April 30 open

Alabama, Arizona, Hawaii, Maine, Texas,

Businesses Closed two months or less:

May 1 open

Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Ohio, West Virginia,

May 3 or 4 open

Kansas, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire

May 8 open

North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island,

Businesses closed two months or more:

May 10 to 15 open

Maryland, Michigan, New Mexico, New York State , Vermont, Delaware,

May 20 to 31

Illinois, Wisconsin, Connecticut,

June 10

Virginia,

Businesses likely closed 3 months or more.

Indefinitely

6 States with no specific shutdown end date include

California, Kentucky, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon and Washington

The longer the shutdown continues, the more harm it will inflict on small business owners and the more workers that will permanently lost their jobs. So the states at the greatest risk of economic collapse due to the shutdown are California, Oregon and Washington.

#50 On May 1, the Washington state Department of Employment Security announced that over 20 percent of Washington’s 4 million workers have filed for unemployment. Many more will apply in the coming weeks. The number could grow to more than 30 percent – which would be over half of all working age adults in the state.

#51 Also on May 1, 2020, Washington Governor Inslee announced that he was extending the closure of nearly all businesses to at least the end of May. This is despite the fact that the rate of hospital admissions has fallen back to the normal level for nearly one month now. He said in his speech that The vast majority of Washingtonians do not want to see their relatives die.” Clearly he fails to realize that his shutting down the economy will cause 10 times the number of deaths that the corona virus caused.

The Junk Science Graph Inslee is using to Stop Washington State Businesses Opening
During his press conference on April 27, and again on May 1, 2020 Governor Inslee displayed a graph from the Institute for Data Modeling (IDM) which is funded by Bill Gates. The graph from an May 1 2020 report showed a slight decline in King County Infections through the month of May – but only if Inslee’s extreme social isolation policies are maintained. The report used data through April 20, 2020. At that time, King County had a Transmission rate of R = 0.94. Note that an R value above 1 means that total infections are increasing and R below 1 means that total infections are decreasing.

Here is the graph from May 1:

17

The black dots are the daily corona positive tests reported by the Washington state Department of Health. Currently, there are less 100 daily new cases in Washington state. Beginning May 1, 2020, the solid line splits into three lines. The line that lowers sharply is based on the assumption that corona daily cases decline sharply in May. I believe this is what is going to happen because our immune system has already suppressed the virus. The gradually declining line is assuming we are like Italy and cases will only decline gradually.

The third sharply rising line is what the IDM claims will happen if Inslee allows businesses to re-open. Despite the fact that there is no evidence to support this claim, Inslee believes these IDM con artists and therefore will keep businesses closed to June. The IDM report claimed that Washington state would see “slowly declining rates of daily cases and deaths as is currently being seen in Italy.” This claim ignores the fact that demographics in Washington state are completely different than the demographics in Italy. Italy has the oldest population in the world with a high percent of smokers and very bad air pollution. Washington state has an average age population, below average smokers and very little air pollution. So why does Governor Inslee insist on using Italy for a model?

The only good news is 16 states are opening now. They will prove that removing social isolation does not increase corona virus fatalities. By the end of May, IDM will be exposed for the hucksters they are and Inslee will be forced to re-open our state economy.

#52 May 4, 2020 NY study Proves that Staying Home Does Not Protect You from the Corona Virus
As I have warned for months, there is no way to prevent exposure from the corona virus. This is why we should focus on strengthening our immune system. Instead of staying inside sitting in front of the TV, we should be outside exercising in the sunshine. What the government has been telling you to do is the exact opposite of what will actually protect you.

Data from 100 New York hospitals who surveyed 1000 new patients confirmed that 66% of new corona virus admissions were people who were at locked down in their homes and were following government guidelines to not leave their homes. An additional 18% were locked down in nursing homes and also never went outside.

None of these people were taking public transportation. Most, the majority of whom were elderly, even had someone else do their shopping for them. Very few of them were working. Most were either retired or unemployed. Almost none of these patients were “front-line essential workers.” This is why locking people up never should have happened in the first place. It depresses their immune system.

 

#53 Politicians are Puzzled that New Confirmed Cases Keep Going Up Even Through Hospitals are now Almost Empty

As I have pointed out for months, the number of confirmed cases has nothing to do with actual infections (which are 50 times the number of confirmed cases). Nor do confirmed cases have anything to do with corona virus fatalities – which are more related to actual infections. Instead, confirmed corona virus cases are simply related to the number of people being tested. As more people are tested, then there will be more confirmed cases. The only way to reduce the number of confirmed cases is to reduce the number of people being tested.

This is why it is ridiculous to use new confirmed cases as a standard to prevent counties from opening up. If the county does any testing at all, the county will find new confirmed cases – and will never be able to open up. Yet, shockingly, this is the plan that Governor Inslee is imposing on counties here in Washington state. Very few counties will ever be able to meet this crazy new standard.

Here is a graph of daily new confirmed cases in the US:

17a

Here is a graph of daily tests per 1000 people in the US:

17b

So far, less than one person in a thousand is tested each day.

 

Will Summer Stop the Corona Virus?
I predict that summer will lead to a significant reduction in corona virus cases and fatalities due to the immune system getting stronger in the summer. The number of daily fatalities should drop dramatically by the end of May. There are many additional reasons to believe that the corona virus will slow down or stop once the sun comes out. For example, here is a quote from one recent study of the corona virus: “In all five selected countries, we found that when there is a significant difference in the daily mean temperature between two regions of a country, a significant difference exists also in the average cumulative daily rate of confirmed cases.” https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.10.20059337v1

The effect of summer is on improving our immune system – in part by the sun increasing our Vitamin D levels and in part by fruits in the summer increasing our Vitamin C levels. Both Vitamin C and D have been shown to have important roles in boosting our immune system – and thereby increasing the odds of our immune system being able to fight off the corona virus.

June 2, 2020: The Day the Bill for Social Isolation Comes Due in Washington state The effect that shutting down nearly all businesses will have on Washington State tax revenue will not be released until 10 am on Tuesday June 2, 2020. It is likely that shortly after this estimate is released, Governor Inslee will have to call a special session of the legislature to cut billions of dollars in programs from the state budget. He will blame the corona virus. But in fact, the billions in cuts will have almost nothing to do with the corona virus. Instead, they will be due to his own incredibly bad decision to shut down all businesses in Washington state.

The people harmed most by extreme social isolation laws will be the one million public school students in Washington state who will be missing their education. Half of these students are so poor that they also rely on the public schools for meals. So a half million children will go hungry. Hundreds of thousands of college students will also see their education harmed. And nearly one million people in Washington state will lose their jobs – increasing poverty and increasing the suicide rate. Currently, 150 people per day commit suicide in the US. How high will the suicide rate rise when 60 million people in the US lose their jobs because of this ineffective social isolation policy? As we have shown earlier, this number might nearly double.

Most of these jobs will not come back when these draconian social isolation restrictions are finally lifted – because many small business owners were already on the edge of bankruptcy. These added restrictions will be the final nail in our economic coffin. Which is why it is important to look at the evidence from objective scientific research on the lack of effectiveness of extreme social isolation policies.

Also on June 4, 2020, I predict that the Washington state legislature will be called into Special Session in order to solve the budget problem that will be announced to the public on June 2, 2020. Inslee and Reykdal have already closed the schools for the rest of the school year. Inslee has also closed nearly all businesses until May 4 2020. I predict that on May 4, 2020, he will announce that businesses must remained closed until June 4, 2020. As noted above, I predict that by June 4, 2020, the number of confirmed new cases will be very low due to the sun coming out and our immune system kicking in. Inslee and Reykdal will use this occasion to declare victory for their social isolation policies.

You can not have a legislative session while the state is in lock down. So June 4 looks like a good day to end the Inslee isolation policies. I also predict that the number of new cases will remain low through September – not because the virus disappeared – but rather because people will have good immune systems. Then the rain will begin in October and the corona virus will come charging back – causing a double bounce or second wave of corona virus fatalities.

October 2020 Get Ready for the Next Wave of Corona Virus School Closures and Business Closures
Corona virus double bounce second wave predictions
On April 1, 2020 , a financial prediction group called Morningstar predicted that there will be a second bounce in November

Month

Apr

May

June

July

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Fatalities thousands

17

112

52

11

2

1

2

37

39

https://www.morningstar.com/articles/976107/coronavirus-update-long-term-economic-impact-forecast-to-be-less-than-2008-recession

The estimate call for a second wave of fatalities in November 2020 are based on the 1918 Spanish Flu second wave as is shown below:

18

What the above chart of the 1918 Spanish Flu does not show is that the double bounce occurred primarily in cities that practiced social isolation. For example, there was more social isolation in the west coast than the east coast or the Midwest and south. Here is a graph of the second wave in these three regions taken from the complete study of 43 cities:

19

 

You can see that while the East region had the highest initial fatalities, this region had almost no second wave. Meanwhile, the west coast had the second highest initial fatalities in November 1918. But then thanks to extreme social isolation measures, they had a significant second wave in January 2019.

The two cities in the Midwest with the biggest second wave were St. Louis MO and Denver CO. These two cities also had among the highest days of interventions at 143 for St. Louis (which included school closures and a public gathering ban) and 151 for Denver.

Here is the Denver Weekly fatality chart:

20

Here is the St. Louis Weekly Fatality chart:

21

I predict that the second wave in the US will occur in October of 2020 and will be much worse than the second wave in 1918. The reason it will be worse is that Washington state and most of the rest of the US have employed draconian social isolation policies that are much more extreme than any policies used anywhere in the US in 1918.

Unless Inslee and Reykdal start seeking out better advice, they will repeat their errors by locking down the Washington state economy again and shutting down the Washington state public schools again.

All this next shutdown will do is further increase fatalities over time by extending the corona virus all the way to next winter – when immune systems are at their weakest. The discredited Ferguson report claims that there will be not just one bounce (like there was in 1918) but a total of 6 additional bounces running all the way through the year 2021. Here is a graph they provide of all of these bounces:

22

They claim that each time a bounce occurs, social isolation policies will need to be restored to prevent mass death. There is no evidence to support this claim of any virus having 6 bounces. Nevertheless, government officials use this crazy Ferguson 6 bounce model to make the threat that social isolation policies will be needed for the next two years. Thus, the only way we will ever restore anything like a normal economy is to boot these nuts out of office.

What’s Next?
Let’s next compare various states to see how well their extreme social isolation policies have been working.