header 2000

GMO Shots, Prion Factories and the Death Cult

Why was the US government creating extraordinarily deadly infectious viruses that, even in small quantities, could kill large numbers of people? What we know for certain is that the US government conducts research which requires the manufacture of deadly viruses. Dr. Fauci has acknowledged that the US government indirectly funded research by the Wuhan Institute of Virology into corona viruses. Glenn Greenwald June 3, 2021


Thousands of people have already been killed by GMO Spike Protein Prion Poisoning

On Friday, July 9, 2021, the VAERS database, which supposedly tracks people who died shortly after taking the GMO shot suddenly jumped by more than 2,000 deaths in a single week -from 7,000 dead at the end of June to over 9,000 deaths as of the first week in July. These deaths include a one-year-old boy and a two-year-old girl.


For reference, the previous annual high in the VAERS database was 182 deaths after taking vaccines. That was for an entire year. We are now at 9,000 official deaths and will likely exceed 20,000 official deaths by the end of the year.


Bad as this seems, the 9,000 official reported deaths are just the tip of this GMO iceberg. Since January 2021, over 150,000 cases have been mysteriously ERASED from the VAERS database. These are case ID numbers in the database one week that no longer appear in the database a week or two later.


Researchers who have been tracking the weekly case ID numbers have concluded that many if not most of these missing VAERS cases were GMO fatalities. Thus, the real number of GMO shot fatalities in the US is likely well over 100,000 and may exceed 200,000 by the end of the year.

Even worse, there are many hidden deaths that do not count. In the VAERS database are reports from nearly 1,000 pregnant women who suffered miscarriages days after taking the GMO shot. Apparently, all the fetuses who died from their moms taking GMO shots do not count as GMO shot fatalities.

Then there are the unreported fatalities. Several studies have shown that less than one percent of all adverse events are reported to the VAERS database. This is on top of all of the adverse events that are reported to the database and then later deleted from the database.

But the real danger is in the long term harm that genetically modified and mutated Spike Proteins can do to our immune system, our circulation system and our nervous system. Spike proteins can cross the blood brain barrier and disrupt brain functioning. These spike proteins turn into prions (mutated proteins) that in turn cause blood clots that in turn lead to heart attacks and strokes. This is basically what is killing people who take the GMO shots.

In harming the human immune system, our circulation system and our nervous system, the spike proteins in the GMO shots also leave people open to all kinds of serious long term diseases that may take years to kill them. This includes Parkinson disease, ALS and other brain diseases.

Another concern is that these prions can disrupt the human reproductive system leading to miscarriages and babies with brain damage including autism.


The GMO shots are actually biological warfare weapons that spread spike proteins throughout the human body. Only time will tell how much damage will be done by turning more than one hundred million to two hundred million Americans into Prion Spike Protein factories. We therefore may be witnessing the worse biological warfare weapon ever produced.

The fact that most Americans still do not know about the adverse effects of GMO shots shows the power of drug companies and billionaires and corrupt politicians in controlling what people see on main stream media. However, despite massive censorship, the truth is gradually starting to emerge.

History of the GMO Death Machine

Thanks to the release of the Fauci emails, we now know that gain of function research that led to the GMO virus and the GMO shots was paid for by US tax payers. On June 2, 2021, the truth about the corona virus being made in a GMO laboratory funded by Tony Fauci and Bill Gates was finally confirmed beyond any reasonable doubt. Thanks to a Freedom of Information Act disclosure, an email from scientist Christian Anderson to Tony Fauci, dated February 1, 2020 stated that he and his fellow scientists felt the virus looked 'potentially' engineered, and that members of his team "all find the (new corona virus) genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.”

Fauci then sent his own email demanding secrecy with an attached document titled "Baric, Shi et al - Nature medicine - SARS Gain of function.pdf

The Fauci email raises three questions…

Who is Baric?

Who is Shi?

Why is Fauci so concerned about hiding their research???

Here is the link to the November 9, 2015 paper published in Nature Medicine by Baric and Shi that Fauci wanted hidden:


Here is a quote from this paper: “We generated a chimeric virus expressing the spike of bat corona virus SHC014 in a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone. The results indicate that viruses encoding the SHC014 spike (protein) can efficiently use the SARS receptor human (ACE2), replicate efficiently in human airway cells and achieve (lethality) equivalent to epidemic strains of (2002) SARS-CoV. “

In plain English, they modified the bat corona virus and combined it with the 2002 SARS Corona virus. They then created GMO mice with human-like lungs and injected the human like mice with their Devils concoction. The concoction grew in the GMO mice, attacking the ACE2 human receptors and likely killing the mice.

Thanks to Fauci ignoring a federal ban on “gain of function” research, all of this was paid for by US taxpayers. Here is a diagram explaining this evil circle of corruption:


Why was Fauci worried? Well, in October 2014, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy ordered researchers conducting ‘gain-of-function’ experiments on influenza and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) to stop their work until a risk assessment was completed. The order came after several accidents in July 2014 at the CDC involving mishandled pathogens.


According to the book, “China COVID-19: The Chimera That Changed the World,” starting in 2004, the Bat lady, Shi, used reverse genetics to produce a SARS-like virus with increased pathogenicity (aka a killer virus).

Why was this Wuhan Lab and UNC Lab allowed to continue despite the federal ban? According to Ralph Baric, the NIH (aka Fauci) “concluded that the work was not so risky as to fall under the moratorium.”

Ralph Baric and the University of North Carolina have been given more than $10 million by Bill Gates for their “health-related” research. The EcoHealth Alliance, a group that was given $1.5 million by Bill Gates, and tens of millions of tax payer dollars from Fauci and the DOD defended the insane Gain of Function research.

There is also this 2013 study on corona virus gain of function research in Nature Medicine in 2013 working with the EcoHealth Alliance aka Bill Gates.

Ge et al. Nature 503, 535–538 (2013)

Here is a link to this horrible bit of research:


What the 2013 and 2015 studies have in common is that they both found that the corona virus spike protein could be GMO altered to infect humans and attack the human ACE2 receptors. The other thing they have in common was being funded by the Diabolical Demons, Bill Gates and Tony Fauci. It appears that Fauci does not want people to know that he and his partner in crime, Bill Gates, paid for the development of the GMO Corona Virus. Here are quotes from the 2013 Corona Virus Gain of Function report:

“The receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV spike (S) protein is directly involved in binding to ACE2 (12). However, all previously identified SL-CoVs have major sequence differences from SARS-CoV in the RBD of their S proteins, including one or two deletions. Replacing the RBD of one SL-CoV S protein with SARS-CoV S conferred the ability to use human ACE2 and replicate efficiently in mice.”

The 2013 study cites two earlier research reports:

Wong, et al 193-amino acid fragment of the SARS corona virus S protein efficiently binds ACE 2. J. Biol. Chem. (2004)

Ren, W. et al. Difference in receptor usage between severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) corona virus and SARS-like corona virus of bat origin. J. Virol. (2008)

The above lets us know three things:

First, Corona Virus Spike Protein modifications have been going on since at least 2004.

Second, the goal has been to find a way to infect and kill humans.

Third, Bill Gates and Tony Fauci played a leading role in the development of the 2019 corona virus spike protein.

But it gets much worse. On November 10, 2020, Dr. Joseph Mercola published an article exposing a massive cover up involving the same research Journal, Nature Medicine, that published the Gain of Function studies Fauci did not want people to know about: “the top medical journal Nature has allowed authors to secretly alter data sets in their papers without publishing notices of correction.”

Among other strange events, on January 20, 2020, a researcher named Zhou submitted an article to Nature claiming to be the genetic code for the BAT virus that was most closely related to the Corona Virus. It was later learned that the BAT virus sequence was actually done in 2016. And the 2016 sequence was actually from a 2013 incident in Yunnan, China, where six miners contracted a pneumonia-like illness in 2013. Three died. All 6 miners exhibited symptoms now associated with COVID-19.


The genetic data for this corona virus sample was taken offline in September 2019 – three months before the official start of the corona virus epidemic. But a portion of this sample was used for the 2013 and 2015 corona virus gain of function studies I quoted above – the same study that Fauci included as an attachment in his 2020 email.

A US federal Commission has now been organized to look into the question of whether the corona virus is natural or man made. Sadly, the head of this commission is Peter Daszak, the head of Eco Health Alliance and is thus an indirect employee of Bill Gates. Daszak has repeatedly stated that the virus was natural. What he fails to mention is that his group gets about $15 million per year from Fauci and the US DOD to invest if biological warfare research.

EcoHealth Alliance was pulling in up to $15 million a year in grant money from an array of federal agencies, including the Defense Department, the Department of Homeland Security, and the U.S. Agency for International Development, according to 990 tax exemption forms it filed with the New York State Attorney General’s Charities Bureau. (See end of Appendix 1 for link to the spreadsheet).

With this extreme level of corruption now out in the open, in this article, we will provide evidence that GMO shots (misleadingly referred to as mRNA vaccines) are in fact biological weapons - deliberately designed to turn people into spike protein prion factories - with the ultimate goal of reducing the human population.

But before we consider the mechanisms of this extremely evil crime against humanity, we need to first review how such a crime can even be possible. This in turn requires looking squarely at evidence that we are living in a death cult – worse than any cult in human history.

The Blind Faith Death Cult
Cults have existed throughout history. People seem to have an innate need to blindly follow their leaders – and stubbornly refuse to consider evidence that their leaders are committing crimes - even if these crimes lead to the death of other cult followers and members of their own family. Cult leaders in turn rely on fear, propaganda and censorship to control cult members.


We call this type of blind faith “drinking the Kool-aid” in reference to the Jonestown cult of 1978. But blind faith death cults go back to the Cultural Revolution in China, the Nazis in Germany, the Fascists in Italy and the Spanish Inquisition in Spain. In every case, absolute power resulted in absolute corruption and the abandonment of common sense and the loss of basic human rights.

Misleading PCR Tests and Fake Death Certificates
There is no better example of mass hysteria than the beginning of the Corona Virus Fear Campaign in March 2020. The CDC, which is controlled by drug corporations and billionaires, announced that it would use PCR Tests with a Cycle Threshold of 35 to 40 to determine who has the corona virus and who died with or from the corona virus. In fact, numerous scientific studies dating back more than 20 years had confirmed that using such a high Cycle Threshold would inflate the number of both Corona cases and Corona fatalities by a factor of 20 to 30 times. So if 100 people died with a positive PCR Test, it is likely that only 3 to 5 actually had the corona virus.


At the same time, on March 4, 2020, the CDC also required doctors to report any death with a positive PCR test as a corona death – even if the person actually died from some other pre-existing condition. For the first time in the history of the US, doctors and coroners were specifically directed how to fill out death certificates.  Here is a link to the new standard death certificate as of March 4, 2020: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/coronavirus/Alert-1-Guidance-for-Certifying-COVID-19-Deaths.pdf

Thus, even if 3 to 5 of the 100 claimed corona fatalities actually had the corona virus when they died, it was possible that NONE of these 100 fatalities actually died from the corona virus.

In order to keep the death cult hypnotized, every TV and radio station tell us constantly how many people in Washington state have been killed by the corona virus. As of May 25, 2021, they claim that 5,722 people in our State have been killed by the Killer Virus.

This claim of 5,722 fatalities is based on the false assumption that the if a person has a positive PCR test, then they must have the corona virus. We know this assumption is false. There are dozens of studies confirming that this assumption is false. But the truth does not matter when one is a member of a cult.

Just think of how many times every day we are lied to by the press, by the CDC and by corrupt politicians. To estimate how many people may have actually died from the corona virus in Washington state, we would need to divide 5,722 by at least 33 – just to get the real number of positive cases (divide by 33 is based on the estimate that 3 out of 99 positive PCR cases are real positives rather than false positives). 5722 divided by 33 = 173. To determine the relative risk of dying from the corona virus, we need to divide 173 by the number of people in Washington state which is about 7.5 million. Thus, the real relative risk for all age groups is about one in 50,000. For most age groups, the real relative risk is less than one in a million. Even for those over age 70, it is still less than one in ten thousand.

A mountain of lies
The fake PCR test is one of dozens of examples of how the CDC, the press and corrupt politicians have lied to us. Remember the claim that we need to lock down all businesses and close all schools in order to Flatten the Curve. Here is a picture taken on April 10, 2020 of an emergency hospital build in Seattle at a cost to tax payers of over one million dollars to handle the flood of corona victims:


This million dollar empty hospital closed after three days without seeing a single patient.

The extremely evil and corrupt people running our government also lied to us about masks – they cannot possibly stop a virus as the holes in the mask at 1000 times bigger than the virus.

Corrupt politicians and the corporate media also lied about the danger of going outdoors – nearly all virus transmissions occur inside of poorly ventilated homes. They also lied about the 6 foot rule – virus can travel more than 30 feet in under 5 minutes. The lies just went on and on and on. Only a cult member would continue to believe such criminals in the face of this evidence.

Now these same criminals want you to believe that the GMO shots are safe and effective.
In fact, even the heavily manipulated data provided by the drug companies was unable to show any real benefit of the taking the GMO shot over taking nothing at all. The GMO shot does not reduce transmission of the virus. It has no effect at all on transmitting or getting the virus – as many people who got the shot are now finding out. The only reason the number of fake cases are now falling is because the CDC recently changed the rules on what counts as a “corona case.” For those who got the shot, the CDC will not call it a case unless the PCR Cycle Threshold is under 28. Even a CT of 28, will still result in about 40% false positives. But this is way less than a 97% rate of false positives with a cycle threshold of 35.

But our real concern is not the lack of effectiveness of GMO shots - but the lack of safety of GMO shots.
Now that we better understand the kind of evil lying people we are dealing with, we are ready to review evidence of the worst most evil crime ever committed in human history. Let’s begin by noting that the RNA is the corona virus is almost certainly man made. It is not just the GMO shot RNA that was made in a laboratory. The corona virus itself was made in a laboratory. I provided evidence of this fact in a book I published more than a year ago on May 8, 2020. You can read this book for free at the following link: https://commonsensebook.org/

In this same book, I provided evidence that, despite the fact that the corona virus was man made, it was no more harmful to anyone under 70 than the seasonal flu. This was because the human immune system is very effective at identifying and fighting off the corona virus.

However, the RNA in the GMO shots is radically different from the RNA in the GMO corona virus. There are several differences between the GMO shot RNA and the GMO virus RNA:

#1 The GMO shot RNA is packaged in a poisonous PEG missile.
The compound or missile used to deliver the RNA in the GMO shot is called polyethylene glycol (PEG). PEG has never been used before in any approved vaccine. But it has been used in many drugs that have triggered anaphylaxis—a potentially life-threatening reaction that can cause rashes, a plummeting blood pressure, shortness of breath, and a fast heartbeat. Some scientists believe that a significant number of people previously exposed to PEG may have high levels of antibodies against PEG, putting them at risk of an anaphylactic reaction to the new GMO shot. GMO shots contain mRNA wrapped in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). The LNPs are “PEGylated”—chemically attached to PEG molecules that cover the outside of the particles and increase their stability. About 72% of people have some antibodies against PEGs, according to a 2016 study. About 7% have a level that may be high enough to predispose them to anaphylactic reactions. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03437#

#2 THE GMO shot RNA evades your immune system
The second difference is that the GMO shots are injected through your skin. The corona virus has to pass through your mouth, nose and lungs. You body knows this which is why your body places its “first line of defense” in the mouth, nose and lungs.


#3 GMO Shot RNA has special binders that help it break open and enter your cells
The third difference between the GMO virus and the GMO shots is that the GMO shot RNA is hidden inside of a GMO missile to help them pass through your cell wall defenses. Real viruses do not have the assistance of a GMO missile.


#4 GMO shot RNA has been altered to make it last longer in order to make more spike proteins

Once inside your cells, the Frankenstein RNA starts instructing your cells to create massive amounts of spike proteins – way more spike proteins than would be created by a corona virus. Because the RNA of the corona virus breaks down quickly after just making a few spike proteins, the demons who designed the GMO shots, decided to replace two amino acids with a pair of prolines. In a 42 page paper published May 10, 2021, called Worse than the disease, the author describes the transformation of the Spike Protein this way:

The mRNA vaccines are designed with an altered sequence that replaces two adjacent amino acids in the membrane fusion domain with a pair of prolines. This is done intentionally in order to force the spike protein to remain in its open state and make it harder for it to fuse with the membrane. This seems to us like a dangerous step towards misfolding potentially leading to prion disease …” https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/23/36

Exploiting the Connection between Prions and Prolines to create a Biological Warfare Weapon
The connection between prions and Prolines has been known for at least 30 years. The first problem is that the Prolines lead to the creation of more than 50 times more spike proteins that the normal corona virus infection process. As a rough estimate, if a normal corona virus infection creates ten spike proteins, a Proline altered RNA process will create 500 spike proteins. But to make matters much worse, a single Proline mutation will lead to the creation of more prions. Because prions are self replicating, a single prion can then turn all of the normal proteins around it into prions. This process is accelerated by the abundant supply of spike proteins created by the super longevity of the Proline altered RNA.


In Appendix 1 at the end of this article is research supporting the contention that the decision to replace two normal amino acids with two Prolines is either the dumbest decision in the history of humanity or – if it was deliberate – the most evil decision in the history of humanity. It explains how the substitution of one protein for another can turn a common protein into a lethal killer.

#5 Poisonous Stabilizers added to mRNA
A huge problem of mRNA is that it is not very stable. Our natural immune system is able to destroy it in about one second. MRNA therefore needs stabilizers to protect it. In 2008, GMO shot makers found they could substitute methyl-pseudo-uridine for uridine in their mRNA to stabilize RNA against degradation. As with the Proline substitution, this allows their GMO RNA to survive long enough to produce more spike proteins. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525001616326818

The researchers that announced this new method wondered why substituting methyl protected the mRNA and increased its ability to make proteins (called transcription). They noted that: “protein synthesis might be inhibited by protein kinase activated by mRNA-containing uridine but not methyl modified uridine.”

Put in plain English, normal uridine limits making protein copies while methyl modified uridine does not limit making protein copies. This is similar to the role of Proline where normal mRNA limits making spike protein copies while Proline modified mRNA increases spike protein copies by a factor of 50 or more. The study above concluded that the methyl substitution increased the amount of protein made by a factor of 10. We can therefore estimate that the mRNA in the GMO shots with both the Proline substitution and the methyl substitution makes at least 50 times 10 or 500 times more spike proteins that the mRNA in the corona virus. Thus, if the corona virus mRNA makes 10 copies of its spike protein, the mRNA with Proline and Methyl substitutions will make at least 5000 copies of its spike protein.

Sadly, the researchers then ignore the fact that there is a very important reason the body limits the production of proteins by mRNA. The reason is that the body has learned over millions of years to have Checks and Balances on all chemical reactions. The goal of GMO shot makers appears to be to force the body into making as many spike proteins as possible, regardless of the harmful effects of the spike proteins. How they do this is by eliminating the nature checks and balances present in the human immune system.

This form of mRNA used in the GMO shots – modified by both Proline and Methyl and Satan only knows what other modifications - has never been seen in nature. But we as humans are about to see what happens when we let drug companies make billions of dollars creating these deadly concoctions.

#6 GMO shot mRNA was also modified to increase the ratio of cytosines and guanines (Cs and Gs) at the expense of adenines and uracils (As and Us).
Here is the beginning of the gene sequence of the Pfizer GMO shot:



The fork symbols, Ψ,are methyl molecules. Note above that all of the Us have been replaced by methyl molecules as we just explained above. What we are now concerned about is the ratio of G and C compared to A and U (sometimes called T and in the above case replaced with methyl). A, C, G and U/T/ Ψ are molecules, linked together as very long double chains (DNA) or single chains (RNA). The biggest danger as far as prions are concerned are sequences using G-X-X-X-G. Therefore, increasing the concentration of Gs is a very dangerous idea as it will clearly lead to more G-X-X-X-G. Yet here is a quote from a study that reverse engineered the Pfizer GMO shot: “RNA with a higher amount of Gs and Cs is converted more efficiently into proteins. This has been achieved in the vaccine RNA by replacing characters with Gs and Cs wherever this was possible.”

Again, changes were made in order to create more spike proteins. Here are quotes from the 2006 study that discovered this shortcut: “GC-rich genes were expressed several-fold to over a 100-fold more efficiently than their GC-poor counterparts. The GC3 content of human genes ranges from 20% to more than 95%:


The average gene has a 50% chance of having GC in the third position. Substituting GC for all third positions raised this chance of GC from 50% to near 100%. The ratio of GC-rich to adenine and thymine-rich gene expression levels varies from 2.5-fold to over 1,000-fold (the median value was 10-fold increase). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1463026/pdf/pbio.0040180.pdf

Thus, GMO shots with Proline, Methyl and GC substitutions will increase spike protein production by 50 x 10 x 10 or a factor of 5000. If a Corona Virus mRNA produces 10 spike proteins, a GMO shot mRNA will produce at least 50,000 spike proteins.


#7 The Spike Proteins are not the same as the Spike proteins created by previous Corona Viruses

Until now, we have only looked at the out of control GMO shot mRNA and its ability to create Spike Protein Prions. But an even greater danger is the Spike Protein itself. Numerous studies have shown that the corona virus spike protein is capable of damaging human cells all by itself – even without the corona virus missile or GMO shot missile that deliver it. But what is less well known is that the spike proteins in the corona virus and in the GMO shots are radically different than the spike proteins in any previous corona virus.

Corona viruses are one of the causes of the common cold. Researchers have known about the existence of corona viruses since 1936. But they have likely existed for thousands and likely millions of years. Corona viruses have always contained spike proteins. Corona viruses mutate about once a week. These rapid mutations are why there has never been an effective vaccine for the common cold. There have been billions of different types of corona viruses that the human immune system has had to deal with – and the human immune system has done an amazing job of handling all of these corona virus spike proteins. However, the 2019 version of the corona virus came with a much different version of the spike protein.

This radical difference between the 2019 version of the corona virus spike protein and all previous versions of the spike protein is one of many reasons to conclude that the 2019 version of the corona virus is a GMO virus that was created in a lab and that it was specifically designed to be a biological warfare weapon.

Keeping in mind that the GMO shot mRNA was specifically designed to increase the amount of spike proteins by a factor of 5000 times, and that this ability to produce spike proteins lasts for at least 8 weeks after getting the second dose of the GMO shots, we will need to take a closer look at this extremely dangerous change in the corona virus spike protein into a silent killer.

The Gylcine Zipper Problem
Studies of human prions have consistently found that sequences of GxxxG lead to bad outcomes. For example, glycines within the glycine zipper transmembrane motifs in the amyloid-β precursor protein (APP) play a central role in the misfolding of amyloid-β linked to Alzheimer’s disease. APP contains a total of four GxxxG motifs. The 2019 version of the corona vrus spike protein, like all previous corona virus spike proteins is a transmembrane protein. But unlike previous corona virus spike proteins, the 2019 version, contains five GxxxG motifs in its sequence.


In March 2020, Tetz and Tetz published a paper noting that the spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 has prion regions that are not present in the spike proteins for any other previous corona viruses. Here is a quote from their study of the structure of the 2019 corona virus spike protein:

“Using the PLAAC algorithm, we identified the presence of prion-like domains in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Compared with other viruses, a striking difference was observed in the distribution of prion-like domains in the spike protein, since SARS-CoV-2 was the only corona virus with a prion-like domain found in the receptor-binding domain of the S1 region of the spike protein.”


On January 18, 2021, J. Bart Classen M.D. published a paper called COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease. In his paper, he proposed that the spike protein in the mRNA vaccines could cause prion-like diseases, in part through its ability to bind to certain proteins and induce their misfolding into prions.

Here are some quotes from his article:

The RNA sequence of the vaccine as well as the spike protein target interaction were analyzed for the potential to convert RNA binding proteins TAR DNA Protein (TDP-43) and Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) binding protein into their pathologic prion conformations.

The results indicate that the vaccine RNA has specific sequences that may induce TDP-43 and FUS proteins to fold into their pathologic prion confirmations. The folding of TDP-43 and FUS into their pathologic prion confirmations is known to cause ALS, front temporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological degenerative diseases.

RNA based vaccines offers special risks of inducing specific adverse events. One such potential adverse event is prion based diseases caused by activation of intrinsic proteins to form prions. A wealth of knowledge has been published on a class of RNA binding proteins shown to participating in causing a number of neurological diseases including Alzheimer’s disease and ALS. TDP-43 and FUS are among the best studied of these proteins.

There have been concerns that these two proteins can be used as BioWeapons. Misuse of research data on the mechanisms by which certain RNA binding proteins like TDP-43, FUS and others can be activated to form disease causing prions.

Analysis of the Pfizer vaccine against COVID-19 identified two potential risk factors for inducing prion disease is humans. The RNA sequence in the vaccine [3] contains sequences believed to induce TDP-43 and FUS to aggregate in their prion based conformation leading to the development of common neurodegerative diseases. In particular it has been shown that RNA sequences GGUA, UG rich sequences, UG tandem repeats, and G Quadruplex sequences, have increased affinity to bind TDP-43 and or FUS and may cause TDP-43 or FUS to take their pathologic configurations in the cytoplasm. In the current analysis a total of sixteen UG tandem repeats (ΨGΨG) were identified and additional UG (ΨG) rich sequences were identified. Two GGΨA sequences were found. https://foundationforhealthresearch.org/review-of-covid-19-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-chronic-adverse-events/

In May 2021, Idrees and Kumar published a paper proposing that the spike protein’s S1 component is prone to act as a functional amyloid and form toxic prion aggregates. These authors wrote that S1 has the ability “to form amyloid and toxic aggregates that can act as seeds to aggregate many of the misfolded brain proteins and can ultimately lead to neurodegeneration.”


In short, the corona virus 2019 version of the spike protein is radically different from any previous versions. These differences are not random. Instead, these changes seem to be specifically designed to create prions in humans thereby increasing blood clots, heart attacks and strokes in humans.

#8 How Prions Cause Blood Clots
Because blood clots seem to be at the center of the spike protein prion modifications, it is important to better understand how prions cause blood clots and how this process relates to the corona virus spike protein. In February, 2021, a brief article was written about the research of Lee Makowski into this subject. Here is a link to this article:


Here are quotes from this article: Early on in the pandemic, Lee Makowski ( researcher at Northeastern University), read an article about the condition of people’s bodies after dying of COVID-19, and he was shocked by what he learned—there was something very wrong with the patients’ blood. The autopsy reports revealed COVID-19 patients were suffering from huge amounts of thick, coagulated blood, and dysfunctional blood vessels were tearing through body tissue instead of repairing it—highly uncommon side effects of respiratory diseases... Makowski speculated that something about the virus might be causing abnormal blood-related complications.

“One of the most perplexing and devastating effects of this disease is the scenario where three or four weeks after being hospitalized with pneumonia, people under the age of 50 are back home, they feel fine, and then all of a sudden they have a stroke and die.”

Makowski believes the spike protein found on the surface of the virus might mimic proteins that regulate blood vessels and control the formation of blood clots. At the tip of the spike protein rests a string of three amino acids called RGD. This structure is known for connecting cells to each other in the body. RGD can contribute to the formation of blood clots.

On January 20, 2021, Makowski published his research at the following link: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/2/146/htm

The article was called: Biological and Clinical Consequences of Integrin Binding via a Rogue RGD Motif in the SARS CoV-2 Spike Protein. Here are some quotes from this very important report:

Integrins on the surfaces of pneumocytes, endothelial cells and platelets may be vulnerable to CoV-2 virion binding. .. leading to the threat of pulmonary thrombosis and embolism, strokes and other thrombotic consequences. The susceptibility of different tissues to virion–integrin interactions may be modulated by a host of factors, including the conformation of relevant integrins and the impact of the tissue microenvironment on spike protein conformation. There is danger that the emergence of receptor-binding domain mutations that increase infectivity may also enhance access of the RGD motif for integrin binding, resulting in viral strains with ACE2 independent routes of cell entry and novel integrin-mediated biological and clinical impacts. The highly infectious variant, B.1.1.7 (or VUI 202012/01), includes a receptor-binding domain amino acid replacement, N501Y, that could potentially provide the RGD motif with enhanced access to cell-surface integrins, with consequent clinical impacts.

Coagulation and angiogenesis are cellular processes regulated, to some degree, by integrins. Evidence is considered here that suggests that an integrin-binding “RGD motif” near the distal tip of the SARS CoV-2 spike protein may interact with integrins on cell surfaces and lead to extensive dysregulation of these processes. COVID-19-associated coagulopathy is multifactorial, involving venous, arterial and microcirculatory systems in a way that appears distinct from other viral illnesses.

In addition, this pathological coagulation may underpin one of the most devastating complications of COVID-19—pulmonary embolism.

These aspects appear to differentiate COVID-19-associated coagulopathy from other viral or bacterial-induced coagulation disorders. COVID-19-associated coagulopathy is distinct from disseminated intravascular coagulation often associated with sepsis and many other pathologies, in presenting an increased risk of thrombosis without bleeding

There are of-the-order-of 100 spikes on the surface of SARS CoV-2, each one containing three RGD motifs. It requires little stretch of the imagination to realize that, when introduced into the bloodstream, virions displaying proteins that exhibit high affinity for platelet integrins in their active conformation could precipitate clot formation, giving rise to microthrombi and coagulopathy throughout the body. 

The MERS spike protein has no corresponding sequence, and no MERS-related coagulopathy appears to have been reported. The spike protein of SARS CoV-2 contains an RGD motif that is missing in other corona viruses.

Binding of virions to endothelial cells in the vasculature could lead to their activation and initiate blood clotting, contributing to the frequently observed widespread clotting and thrombosis in multiple organs. Furthermore, if virions bind to integrins on platelets, they could cause platelets to aggregate and bind to the endothelium. These processes would lead to the production of micro- and macro-thrombi in the vasculature, where they could pose a serious threat of pulmonary thrombosis and embolism, strokes and other thrombotic consequences.

Clinical support for Makowski’s claims come from an April 10, 2020 study. Here is the link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32291094/

Klok et al. evaluated the occurrence of venous and arterial thrombotic events, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) and stroke in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19…

Here are quotes from this report:

“The 31% incidence of thrombotic complications in ICU patients with COVID-19 infections is remarkably high. Our findings reinforce the recommendation to strictly apply pharmacological thrombosis prophylaxis in all COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU… myocardial infarction and systemic arterial events in 184 patients with Covid-19 pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The composite incidence of thrombotic events was 31%. Venous thromboembolic events were the most common (27%).”

The researchers blamed the clotting problem on interaction of the spike protein with ACE2 receptors: “ACE2 mRNA is present in all major organs, however, its protein expression is greatest in several key organs and locations that play important roles in the initiation of infection and its phenotypic expression, including venous, arterial and microvascular thrombosis. The major organs include the nasopharynx, oropharynx, lungs, stomach, small intestine, spleen, liver, kidney and brain with binding to ACE2 receptors on epithelial, endothelial and enterocytic cells. The density of ACE2R is particularly high in the lungs, heart, veins and arteries.

In short, the 2019 version of the corona virus spike protein seems specifically designed to create blood clots.

#9 Spike Protein Shedding… How Prions can spread from one person to another

In my previous articles, I have provided evidence that with every breathe we exhale and inhale more than one million viruses – whether we are wearing a mask or not. There is no escaping viruses or bacteria. Because prions are folded proteins, they are much smaller than viruses. They are also much more stable than viruses. It is therefore nearly certain that we also inhale and exhale more than a million prions with every breathe. This is why we need to work on improving our natural immune system – which is not only the first line of defense against bacteria and viruses but also our first line of defense against prions. In the present case, what is being shed are both 2019 spike proteins -which are themselves toxic – and in the case of people who took the GMO shot, they also exhale GMO shot modified spike proteins – which are even more toxic.

When a person gets a GMO shot, their cells will start making massive amounts of GMO shot modified spike proteins. Some of these spike proteins will cause blood clots and other problems. The immune system will try to get rid of these spike proteins. One way it will get rid of them is by exhaling them.

This fact has caused some concern among those who did not take the GMO shot that they could be inhaling deadly spike proteins that were exhaled from those who did take the GMO shots. Prion aggregates are resistant to chemical disinfectants. They cannot be destroyed by ordinary disinfection or cooking. This makes disposal and containment of Prions difficult.

While this is a concern, it is likely that the amount of deadly spike proteins being inhaled is a very small fraction of the spike proteins that people who take the GMO shots are being exposed to. The people most likely to be harmed by these “second-hand smoke” spike proteins are elderly people whose immune systems are weaker than the immune systems of younger people.

In support of my claim that second hand harm from prions is a concern, a Phase 1/2/3 study on the Pfizer mRNA vaccine implied that they anticipated the possibility of secondary exposure to the vaccine (BioNTech, 2020). The protocol included the requirement that “exposure during pregnancy” should be reported. They then gave examples of “environmental exposure during pregnancy” which included exposure “to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.” Clearly the drug pushers themselves are aware of the danger of second hand prions.

#10 An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of GMO shots

If you are concerns about prions, you should take steps to boost your immune systems naturally. Effective steps include getting out in the sunlight to raise vitamin D levels, exercising to improve circulation and eating organic whole foods rather than chemical-laden processed foods. 50 years of studies have shown that taking Vitamin C and D supplements can improve your immune system.

You should also avoid things that harm your immune system. These harmful things include wearing masks, hiding inside your home and sitting on your couch watching scary fake news casts giving you false numbers of corona virus cases and fatalities. Fear is not only the mind killer, it is also the immune system killer.


More Evidence that GMO Shots are Biological Warfare Weapons

#1 The 2019 version of the corona virus Spike Proteins are radically different from any previous version of the corona virus. These differences all increase the formation of prions and blood clots.

#2 The mRNA in the GMO shots is different from the mRNA in the 2019 version of the corona virus mRNA. These differences all further increase the lethality of the spike proteins first by taking steps to evade the human immune system, second by increasing the number of spike proteins (by a factor of 5000 times) and third by changing the composition of the spike proteins. These are not random changes. These are not merely unwise or misguided changes. These are not changes that improve health or improve your immune system. These are changes intended to destroy your health and destroy your immune system. These are changes that could only have been created in a Biological Warfare laboratory using advanced genetic modification techniques. These changes are proof that there is a war going on - and we are the intended victims. It is time to wake up and start fighting back.

Appendix 1 How to Turn a normal protein into a lethal killer

To better understand the danger created by the substitution of two normal amino acids with two prolines, we need to briefly explain what proteins, amino acids, proline and prions are. Amino acids are the building blocks that combine to form proteins. They are similar to the Lincoln Logs used by children to make pretend houses. Amino acids tend to form long chains. Prolines are a specific type of amino acid where the carbon atoms link back on themselves to form a loop. Proline loops cause complex bends in a chain of amino acids. Here is an image of a Proline compared to an amino acid called Glycine:


Proteins are complex combinations of many amino acids:


Here is an image of the corona virus spike protein


Prions are proteins that have been mutated and mis-folded. Prions are responsible for all kinds of lethal problems ranging from blood clots, heart attacks, strokes and ALS. They were originally discovered in the 1980s while looking for the cause of Mad Cow Disease. Here is an image of a prion:


The question is what causes a protein to misfold and mutate into a prion. All it takes is a study of Mad Cow disease to understand that Proline mutations are the most likely suspect for turning normal proteins into mutated prions.

Evidence that Moderna and Pfizer substitute Proline

Here is a quote from an article indicating that both Moderna and Pfizer have done proline substitution: To stabilize the S protein, a few different strategies have been adopted. A mutation where amino acids 986 and 987 are replaced with prolines (S-2P), stabilizing the S glycoprotein in the prefusion conformation but still allowing for cleavage of the S1 and S2 subunits is the approach used in the licensed vaccines mRNA-1273 (Moderna) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer).


The plan to modify this MRNA was actually proposed in 2017 in this article:

Recent work on the fusion proteins from HIV-1 and respiratory syncytial virus has demonstrated that proline substitutions in the loop between the first heptad repeat and the central helix restrict premature triggering of the fusion protein and often increase expression yields of prefusion ectodomains. Introduction of single proline substitutions into a similar region in the MERS-CoV S2 subunit dramatically increased expression levels of the ectodomains, and two consecutive proline substitutions at residues V1060 and L1061 (hereafter referred to as “2P”) resulted in a >50-fold improvement in yield.


Here is quote from a detailed article about the role of proline in Mad Cow disease from 1998 called “Cis and trans proline in the 3D prion structure”: “Proline along with glycine is more commonly found in sharp turns connecting beta strands (beta bends) and in rigid extended structural proteins .. There are no mutations to proline in prion sequence data, only from proline...The correct spacing of glycines and prolines is important because only glycines can form the interior core of structural coils and only proline has cis-trans options and wiggle room on the peptide bond angle.” Clearly there is an important relationship between glycine, proline and prion disease.


Here are quotes from a 2012 study on the human prion disease ALS called “The tip of the iceberg: RNA-binding proteins with prion-like domains in neurodegenerative disease”:

“RNA-binding prion candidates are inexorably emerging, one by one, in the pathology and genetics of devastating neurodegenerative disorders, including: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Alzheimer's disease and Huntington's disease. For example, FUS and TDP-43, which rank 1st and 10th among RRM-bearing prion candidates, form cytoplasmic inclusions in the degenerating motor neurons of ALS patients and mutations in TDP-43 and FUS cause familial ALS… it is now possible to induce prion disease in mice by simply inoculating recombinant prion protein (PrP) that has been previously folded into a self-templating form… As self-replicating entities, prions are protein-based genetic elements… The initiation of selfish prion replication launches a microevolutionary process in which the prion replicator initially prospers and amplifies but ultimately destroys the host. The mammalian nervous system is particularly vulnerable to this conflict and can become severely and selectively devastated by prions.


Prusiner discovered that the amino acid leucine is substituted by the amino acid Proline (Prusiner, 1995). An incident of this type is commonly known as a point mutation. For the prion, replication involves converting conventional proteins into prions. The resulting PrPSc is a four helix bundle protein with four regions of secondary structure, numbered H1 through H4 (Prusiner, 1997). Mestel (1996) explains that prions replicate by recruiting normal proteins to their cause, "flipping" them into a rogue prion-like shape that can go on to infect other cells and animals. Prusiner SB (1995) Prion diseases. Scientific American, 272(1):48-56. http://anthropology.ua.edu/bindon/ant570/Papers/McGrath/McGrath.htm

Prusiner won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1997 for his groundbreaking work. Here are quotes from Prusiner’s Nobel Lecture, “Prions” which was published in 1999 (note that PrP stands for Prion Protein):

More than 20 mutations of the PrP gene are now known to cause the inherited human prion diseases… Because some features of the diseases caused by prions and viruses are similar, some scientists have difficulty accepting the existence of prions despite a wealth of scientific data supporting this concept… PrPC (correctly folded protein) contains about 40% a-helix and little b-sheet, whereas PrPSc (incorrectly folded protein) is composed of about 30% a-helix and 45% b-sheet (25, 137). Nevertheless, these two proteins have the same amino acid sequence!

Prion strains and the species barrier are of paramount importance in understanding the BSE epidemic in Great Britain, in which it is estimated that almost one million cattle were infected with prions. The mean incubation time for BSE is about 5 years... there is no evidence of a preexisting prion disease of cattle, either in Great Britain or elsewhere.


Here are quotes from a 2004 study:

Overproduction of the protein increases the frequency with which the prion arises. Simply because there is more of the protein capable of undergoing the prion change, one expects the frequency with which the prion arises de novo to increase.


Here are quotes from another 2014 study:

PrP is initially translated as a 254 amino acid polypeptid… The mature form is a 208 amino acid glycoprotein… Metal ions might also play an important role in making certain brain regions more vulnerable to neurodegenerative diseases. Maintenance of metals is critical because metals can be toxic in free forms. Metals also have variable concentrations across brain regions and, interestingly, the levels of three common metal ions, copper, iron and zinc, seem to be regulated by PrP in normal brains...In light of the growing number of ‘infectious’ proteins identified, the term ‘prionoid’ was coined to distinguish protein aggregates that are likely to not be naturally transmissible between individuals from those that are (prions)… Mammalian prions, considered to be ‘super spreaders’ because of their unique ability to spread between individuals, have been posited to transit the brain via each of the above mechanisms.


Here are quotes from a 2015 study of human prion disease:

“Human prion diseases can have acquired, sporadic, or genetic origins, each of which results in the conversion of prion protein (PrP) to transmissible, pathological forms. The genetic prion disease Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker GSS syndrome can arise from point mutations of prolines 102 or 105.


Here are quotes from another 2015 study:

Amyloid fibril formation is associated with numerous human diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease and type II diabetes. Prions represent a subset of amyloid diseases in which the amyloid state is infectious… simply creating tandem repeats of aggregation-prone segments within nonprion proteins can be sufficient to create prion activity, suggesting that such segment duplication may represent a mechanism for generation of new prion domains… only a few mutations are required to confer prion activity. This may explain why single-point mutations in so many different PrLDs are sufficient to cause degenerative diseases like amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)


Here are quotes from a 2016 study: The substitution of leucine for proline P102 (P102L) (Hsiao et al., 1989), or of leucine or serine for proline P105 (P102L/S) (Yamazaki et al., 1999) in PrP is among the mutations that underlie the development of GSS. Previously, we have found that these mutations preclude PrP from folding properly.


Here are quotes from a 2017 study:

Misfolded proteins exist in cells together with unfolded, intermediately folded, and correctly folded species. It is now believed that many, if not all, proteins can form amyloid fibrils (combinations of prions) under appropriate biochemical conditions...Once formed, higher order amyloid aggregates are highly resistant to degradation. In addition, the amyloid state is extremely stable thermodynamically, because of the extensive contacts made between the protein chains of the polymer. The thermodynamic stability of amyloid aggregates also contributes to their ability to convert native proteins into amyloid forms (i.e., to seed prion-like propagation)…

A key feature of misfolded protein diseases is the ability of the pathogenic protein species to propagate in a prion-like manner by recruiting normally folded counterparts to adopt pathogenic conformations. Misfolding of one disease causing protein can induce misfolding of other aggregation-prone proteins.


More Research on the Evolution of the Gates Fauci GMO Biological Weapon Program

Two notable virologists claim to have found "unique fingerprints" on COVID-19 samples that only could have arisen from laboratory manipulation, according to an explosive 22-page paper obtained by the Daily Mail.

British professor Angus Dalgleish - best known for creating the world's first 'HIV vaccine', and Norwegian virologist Dr. Birger Sørensen - chair of pharmaceutical company, Immunor, who has published 31 peer-reviewed papers and holds several patents, wrote that while analyzing virus samples last year, the pair discovered "unique fingerprints" in the form of "six inserts" created through gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China

They also conclude that "SARS-Coronavirus-2 has "no credible natural ancestor" and that it is "beyond reasonable doubt" that the virus was created via "laboratory manipulation.

Last year, Sørensen told Norwegian broadcaster NRK that COVID-19 has properties which have 'never been detected in nature,' and that the United States has 'collaborated for many years on coronavirus research through "gain of function" studies with China.


The paper detailing their months-long "forensic analysis," which looked back at experiments done at the Wuhan Institute of Virology between 2002 and 2019, is set to be published in the scientific journal Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery.

More via the Mail:

Digging through archives of journals and databases, Dalgleish and Sørensen pieced together how Chinese scientists, some working in concert with American universities, allegedly built the tools to create the coronavirus. 

Much of the work was centered around controversial 'Gain of Function' research – temporarily outlawed in the US under the Obama administration.

Gain of Function involves tweaking naturally occurring viruses to make them more infectious, so that they can replicate in human cells in a lab, allowing the virus's potential effect on humans to be studied and better understood. 

Dalgleish and Sørensen claim that scientists working on Gain of Function projects took a natural coronavirus 'backbone' found in Chinese cave bats and spliced onto it a new 'spike', turning it into the deadly and highly transmissible SARS-Cov-2.

One tell-tale sign of alleged manipulation the two men highlighted was a row of four amino acids they found on the SARS-Cov-2 spike.

In an exclusive interview with DailyMail.com, Sørensen said the amino acids all have a positive charge, which cause the virus to tightly cling to the negatively charged parts of human cells like a magnet, and so become more infectious

But because, like magnets, the positively charged amino acids repel each other, it is rare to find even three in a row in naturally occurring organisms, while four in a row  is 'extremely unlikely,' the scientist said.

'The laws of physics mean that you cannot have four positively charged amino acids in a row. The only way you can get this is if you artificially manufacture it,' Dalgleish told DailyMail.com.

Their new paper says these features of SARS-Cov-2 are 'unique fingerprints' which are 'indicative of purposive manipulation', and that 'the likelihood of it being the result of natural processes is very small.'

'A natural virus pandemic would be expected to mutate gradually and become more infectious but less pathogenic which is what many expected with the COVID-19 pandemic but which does not appear to have happened,' the scientists wrote.

'The implication of our historical reconstruction, we posit now beyond reasonable doubt, of the purposively manipulated chimeric virus SARS-CoV-2 makes it imperative to reconsider what types of Gain of Function experiments it is morally acceptable to undertake.

Sørensen and Dalgleish aren't the first scientists to find unusual features within COVID-19. Last June, the Daily Telegraph reported that there are two unique features to COVID-19:

First, the virus binds more strongly to human ACE2 enzymes than any other species, including bats.

Second, SARS-CoV-2 has a "furin cleavage site" missing in its closes bat-coronavirus relative, RaTG-13, which makes it significantly more infectious - a finding we reported in late February.

According to Israeli geneticist, Dr. Ronen Shemesh, the Furin site is the most unusual finding.

"I believe that the most important issue about the differences between ALL coronavirus types is the insertion of a Furin protease cleavage site at the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2," he said. "Such an insertion is very rare in evolution, the addition of such 4 Amino acids alone in the course of only 20 years is very unlikely."

"There are many reasons to believe that the COVID-19 generating SARS-CoV-2 was generated in a lab. Most probably by methods of genetic engineering," he said, adding "I believe that this is the only way an insertion like the FURIN protease cleavage site could have been introduced directly at the right place and become effective."

Dr Shemesh, who has a PhD in Genetics and Molecular Biology from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, and over 21 years of experience in the field of drug discovery and development, said it is even “more unlikely” that this insertion happened in exactly the right place of the cleavage site of the spike protein - which is where it would need to occur to make the virus more infectious. -Daily Telegraph

"What makes it even more suspicious is that fact that this insertion not only occurred on the right place and in the right time, but also turned the cleavage site from an Serine protease cleavage site to a FURIN cleavage site," he added.

In January 2020, a team of Indian scientists wrote in a now-retracted paper that the coronavirus may have been genetically engineered to incorporate parts of the HIV genome, writing "This uncanny similarity of novel inserts in the 2019- nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature," meaning - it was unlikely to have occurred naturally.

The next month, a team of researchers in Nankai University noted that COVID-19 has an 'HIV-like mutation' that  allows it to quickly enter the human body by binding with a receptor called ACE2 on a cell membrane.

Other highly contagious viruses, including HIV and Ebola, target an enzyme called furin, which works as a protein activator in the human body. Many proteins are inactive or dormant when they are produced and have to be “cut” at specific points to activate their various functions.
When looking at the genome sequence of the new coronavirus, Professor Ruan Jishou and his team at Nankai University in Tianjin found a section of mutated genes that did not exist in Sars, but were similar to those found in HIV and Ebola. -SCMP

According to the Nankai University study, the furin binding method is "100 to 1,000 times as efficient' as SARS at entering cells.

"This protein cleaving protein is highly promiscuous, it’s found in many human tissues and cell types and is involved in many OTHER virus types activation and infection mechanisms (it is involved in HIV, Herpes, Ebola and Dengue virus mechanisms)," said Dr. Shemesh. "If I was trying to engineer a virus strain with a higher affinity and infective potential to humans, I would do exactly that: I would add a Furin Cleavage site directly at the original less effective and more cell specific cleavage site."

Meanwhile, Flinders University Professor Nikolai Petrovsky found last year either "a remarkable coincidence or a sign of human intervention" within COVID-19 telling the Telegraph that COVID-19 is "exquisitely adapted to humans."

really don’t know where this virus came from - that’s the truth. The two possibilities is that it was a chance transmission of a virus...the other possibility is that it was an accidental release of the virus from a laboratory," he said, adding "One of the possibilities is that an animal host was infected by two coronaviruses at the same time and COVID-19. The same process can happen in a petri-dish."

"In other words COVID-19 could have been created from that recombination event in an animal host or it could have occurred in a cell-culture experiment. I’m certainly very much in favour of a scientific investigation. Its only objective should be to get to the bottom of how did this pandemic happen and how do we prevent a future pandemic."

Keep in mind - reporting any of this last year was punishable by social media banishment, demonetiziation, and hit-piece articles from propagandists peddling CCP talking points.


COVID Vaccines May Bring Avalanche of Neurological Disease

Research shows deaths are 15 times higher during the first 14 days after the first COVID injection among people over the age of 60, compared to those who aren't vaccinated

Another study shows that after COVID-19 vaccines were implemented, overall death rates have increased. The next 10 to 15 years, we are likely to see spikes in prion diseases, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases at younger ages, and blood disorders such as blood clots, hemorrhaging, stroke and heart failure

  Five months into the vaccination campaign, statistics tell a frightening story. Seneff cites research2 showing deaths are 14.6 times more frequent during the first 14 days after the first COVID injection among people over the age of 60, compared to those who aren't vaccinated. That is extraordinary. You can read the full paper here.

Dr. Richard Ebright, board of governors professor of chemistry and chemical biology at Rutgers University, said that from the very first reports of a novel bat-related coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, it took him “a nanosecond or a picosecond” to consider a link to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Only two other labs in the world, in Galveston, Texas, and Chapel Hill, North Carolina, were doing similar research. “It’s not a dozen cities,” he said. “It’s three places.”

A 2015 research paper by Shi Zhengli and the University of North Carolina epidemiologist Ralph Baric proving that the spike protein of a novel coronavirus could infect human cells. Using mice as subjects, they inserted the protein from a Chinese rufous horseshoe bat into the molecular structure of the SARS virus from 2002, creating a new, infectious pathogen.The paper’s acknowledgments cited funding from the U.S. National Institutes of Health and from a nonprofit called EcoHealth Alliance. University of North Carolina virologist Ralph Baric collaborated with Shi Zhengli on a gain-of-function coronavirus experiment in 2015.

In an October 2013 Nature study, Shi Zhengli reported a key discovery: that certain bat viruses could potentially infect humans without first jumping to an intermediate animal. By isolating a live SARS-like bat coronavirus for the first time, her team had found that it could enter human cells through a protein called the ACE2 receptor.

RaTG13 appeared identical to RaBtCoV/4991—the virus from the cave where the miners fell ill in 2012 with what looked like COVID-19. WIV had a database of 22,000 GMO viruses which they took offline on September 12, 2019 – three months before the official start of the corona virus outbreak.


a series of S chimeras was constructed by inserting different sequences of the SARS-CoV S into the SL-CoV S backbone

insert region (amino acids 310 to 518) was found to be sufficient to convert the SL-CoV S from non-ACE2 binding to human ACE2 binding, indicating that the SL-CoV S is largely compatible with SARS-CoV S protein both in structure and in function.

The key difference between these two groups of closely related viruses lies in their S protein sequences, specifically, the RBM, in which there are two deletions in the bat SL-CoV S sequences.

EcoHealth Alliance Funding Spreadsheet


2015 to 2020: About $15 million per year

About the Author

David Spring has a degree in Science Education from the University of Washington. David has published numerous books and articles exposing the crimes committed by Bill Gates over the past 40 years. These books include Free Yourself from Microsoft and the NSA (about how Bill Gates has placed hidden back doors in Windows computers) and Weapons of Mass Deception (about how Bill Gates has used propaganda to destroy our public schools).

On May 8, 2020, just over one year ago, David published the book, Common Sense versus Corona Virus Hysteria. This book exposed the role Bill Gates played in promoting Corona Virus Hysteria for his own financial gain. Folks can read the book for free at the website, Common Sense Book dot org. The book includes hundreds of links to scientific studies confirming that the corona virus is no more harmful than the seasonal flu. But the worst crime of all is the harm of GMO shots – harm that is being deliberately hidden from the public.